Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorHospital General de Granollers
dc.contributor.authorLaserna-Mendieta, Emilio Jose
dc.contributor.authorNavarro Sánchez, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorCasabona Francés, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorSavarino, Edoardo
dc.contributor.authorAMORENA, EDURNE
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Martínez, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorMasiques-Mas, Maria Lluïsa
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-03T08:38:35Z
dc.date.available2024-04-03T08:38:35Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-29
dc.identifier.citationLaserna-Mendieta EJ, Navarro P, Casabona-Francés S, Savarino EV, Amorena E, Pérez-Martínez I, et al. Swallowed topical corticosteroids for eosinophilic esophagitis: Utilization and real-world efficacy from the EoE CONNECT registry. United European Gastroenterol J. 2024 Jan 29.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/11276
dc.descriptionEosinophilic esophagitis; Swallowed topical corticosteroids; Cross-sectional study
dc.description.abstractBackground: Swallowed topical corticosteroids (tC) are common therapy for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Widely heterogeneous results have occurred due to their active ingredients, formulations and doses. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of topical corticosteroid therapy for EoE in real-world practice. Methods: Cross-sectional study analysis of the multicentre EoE CONNECT registry. Clinical remission was defined as a decrease of ≥50% in dysphagia symptom scores; histological remission was defined as a peak eosinophil count below 15 per high-power field. The effectiveness in achieving clinico-histological remission (CHR) was compared for the main tC formulations. Results: Overall, data on 1456 prescriptions of tC in monotherapy used in 866 individual patients were assessed. Of those, 904 prescriptions with data on formulation were employed for the induction of remission; 234 reduced a previously effective dose for maintenance. Fluticasone propionate formulations dominated the first-line treatment, while budesonide was more common in later therapies. A swallowed nasal drop suspension was the most common formulation of fluticasone propionate. Doses ≥0.8 mg/day provided a 65% CHR rate and were superior to lower doses. Oral viscous solution prepared by a pharmacist was the most common prescription of budesonide; 4 mg/day provided no benefit over 2 mg/day (CHR rated being 72% and 80%, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed budesonide orodispersible tablets as the most effective therapy (OR 18.9, p < 0.001); use of higher doses (OR 4.3, p = 0.03) and lower symptom scores (OR 0.9, p = 0.01) were also determinants of effectiveness. Conclusion: Reduced symptom severity, use of high doses, and use of budesonide orodispersible tablets particularly were all independent predictors of tC effectiveness.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUnited European Gastroenterology Journal;
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectEsòfag - Malalties
dc.subjectCorticosteroides
dc.subjectTrastorns de la deglució
dc.subject.meshEosinophilic Esophagitis
dc.subject.meshAdrenal Cortex Hormones
dc.subject.meshDeglutition Disorders
dc.titleSwallowed topical corticosteroids for eosinophilic esophagitis: Utilization and real-world efficacy from the EoE CONNECT registry
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ueg2.12533
dc.subject.decsesofagitis eosinofílica
dc.subject.decshormonas de la corteza suprarrenal
dc.subject.decstrastornos de la deglución
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12533
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Laserna-Mendieta EJ] Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Tomelloso, Tomelloso, Spain. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa, Madrid, Spain. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla‐La Mancha (IDISCAM), Madrid, Spain. Laboratory Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. [Navarro P] Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Tomelloso, Tomelloso, Spain. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa, Madrid, Spain. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla‐La Mancha (IDISCAM), Madrid, Spain. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. [Casabona-Francés S] Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa, Madrid, Spain. Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain. [Savarino EV] Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. Gastroenterology Unit, Azienza Ospedaliera di Padova, Padova, Italy. [Amorena E] Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. [Pérez-Martínez I] Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain. Diet, Microbiota and Health Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Oviedo, Spain. [Masiques-Mas ML] Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Granollers, Granollers, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid38284792
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record