Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorSilgado Gimenez, Aroa
dc.contributor.authorGual-Gonzalez, Lídia
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Montalvá, Adrián
dc.contributor.authorOliveira Souto, Ines Mercedes
dc.contributor.authorGoterris Bonet, Lidia
dc.contributor.authorSerre Delcor, Nuria
dc.contributor.authorEsperalba Esquerra, Juliana
dc.contributor.authorFernandez Naval, Candela
dc.contributor.authorPumarola Suñé, Tomàs
dc.contributor.authorSulleiro Igual, Elena
dc.contributor.authorGómez i Prat, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorMolina Romero, Israel
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-04T10:34:10Z
dc.date.available2022-05-04T10:34:10Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-15
dc.identifier.citationSilgado A, Gual-Gonzalez L, Sánchez-Montalvá A, Oliveira-Souto I, Goterris L, Serre-Delcor N, et al. Analytical Evaluation of Dried Blood Spot and Rapid Diagnostic Test as a New Strategy for Serological Community Screening for Chronic Chagas Disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Sep 15;11:736630.
dc.identifier.issn2235-2988
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/7476
dc.descriptionTrypanosoma cruzi; Dried blood spot (DBS); Serological screening
dc.description.abstractBackground: Chagas disease is a public health problem not only in Latin America, but also in other regions, including Spain, due to migration movements. Conventional serological diagnosis requires an invasive sample (plasma or serum) and a well-equipped laboratory. To circumvent those limitations, blood samples dried on filter paper (DBS) or Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) could be a practical alternative to reference protocol for serological screening in epidemiological studies. We evaluated the usefulness of dried blood sampling and a rapid diagnostic test (Trypanosoma Detect™) for the detection of antibodies against T. cruzi for their use in community-based screening. Methodology/Principal Findings: A total of 162 stored paired whole-blood and serum samples from Latin American migrants and 25 negative-control blood samples were included. Diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease was performed in serum according to WHO algorithms. Blood samples were retrospectively collected as dried spots and then analyzed using two different serological techniques, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (E-CLIA). Whole-blood samples were also used to evaluate a rapid diagnostic test based on immunochromatography. A better correlation with conventional serum was observed in dried blood elutes using E-CLIA than ELISA (97% vs. 77% sensitivity, respectively). Both assays reported 100% specificity. The median cut-off index values of E-CLIA for dried blood were significantly lower than those for serum (138.1 vs. 243.3, P<0.05). The Trypanosoma Detect™ test presented a sensitivity and specificity of 89.6% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: The detection of antibodies against T. cruzi in dried blood samples shows a higher sensitivity when using E-CLIA compared with ELISA. Trypanosoma Detect™ is easier to use but has a lower sensitivity. Hence, we propose a sequential strategy based on performing the rapid test first, and a negative result will be confirmed by DBS-ECLIA for use in community Chagas disease screening programs.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFrontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology;11
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectChagas, Malaltia de - Diagnòstic
dc.subjectSang - Anàlisi
dc.subjectSerodiagnòstic
dc.subject.meshChagas Disease
dc.subject.mesh/diagnosis
dc.subject.meshDiagnostic Tests, Routine
dc.subject.meshDried Blood Spot Testing
dc.titleAnalytical Evaluation of Dried Blood Spot and Rapid Diagnostic Test as a New Strategy for Serological Community Screening for Chronic Chagas Disease
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fcimb.2021.736630
dc.subject.decsenfermedad de Chagas
dc.subject.decs/diagnóstico
dc.subject.decspruebas diagnósticas rutinarias
dc.subject.decsanálisis de manchas de sangre seca
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.736630
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Silgado A, Goterris L, Esperalba J, Fernández-Naval C, Pumarola T, Sulleiro E] Servei de Microbiologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. PROSICS Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Gual-Gonzalez L] Laboratory of Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States. [Sánchez-Montalvá A, Oliveira-Souto I, Serre-Delcor N, Gomez-I-Prat J, Molina I] Servei de Malalties Infeccioses, Drassanes - Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. PROSICS Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid34604116
dc.identifier.wos000701205100001
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record