Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorBorghaei, Hossein
dc.contributor.authorGettinger, Scott
dc.contributor.authorVokes, Everett
dc.contributor.authorChow, Laura
dc.contributor.authorBurgio, Marco Angelo
dc.contributor.authorde Castro Carpeno, Javier
dc.contributor.authorFelip Font, Enriqueta
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-07T12:46:24Z
dc.date.available2022-06-07T12:46:24Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-01
dc.identifier.citationBorghaei H, Gettinger S, Vokes EE, Chow LQM, Burgio MA, de Castro Carpeno J, et al. Five-Year Outcomes From the Randomized, Phase III Trials CheckMate 017 and 057: Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):723–33.
dc.identifier.issn1527-7755
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/7634
dc.descriptionNivolumab; Docetaxel; Lung cancer
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In two phase III trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057), nivolumab showed an improvement in overall survival (OS) and favorable safety versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated, advanced squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC, respectively. We report 5-year pooled efficacy and safety from these trials. METHODS Patients (N = 854; CheckMate 017/057 pooled) with advanced NSCLC, ECOG PS ≤ 1, and progression during or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point for both trials was OS; secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Exploratory landmark analyses were investigated. RESULTS After the minimum follow-up of 64.2 and 64.5 months for CheckMate 017 and 057, respectively, 50 nivolumab-treated patients and nine docetaxel-treated patients were alive. Five-year pooled OS rates were 13.4% versus 2.6%, respectively; 5-year PFS rates were 8.0% versus 0%, respectively. Nivolumab-treated patients without disease progression at 2 and 3 years had an 82.0% and 93.0% chance of survival, respectively, and a 59.6% and 78.3% chance of remaining progression-free at 5 years, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 8 of 31 (25.8%) nivolumab-treated patients between 3–5 years of follow-up, seven of whom experienced new events; one (3.2%) TRAE was grade 3, and there were no grade 4 TRAEs. CONCLUSION At 5 years, nivolumab continued to demonstrate a survival benefit versus docetaxel, exhibiting a five-fold increase in OS rate, with no new safety signals. These data represent the first report of 5-year outcomes from randomized phase III trials of a programmed death-1 inhibitor in previously treated, advanced NSCLC.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Clinical Oncology;39(7)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectAvaluació de resultats (Assistència sanitària)
dc.subjectPulmons - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectImmunoteràpia
dc.subject.meshCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshImmunotherapy
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.titleFive-Year Outcomes From the Randomized, Phase III Trials CheckMate 017 and 057: Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.20.01605
dc.subject.decscarcinoma de pulmón de células no pequeñas
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsinmunoterapia
dc.subject.decsresultado del tratamiento
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01605
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Borghaei H] Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA. [Gettinger S] Yale Comprehensive Cancer Center, New Haven, CT. [Vokes EE] Univeristy of Chicago Medicine and Biologic Sciences Division, Chicago, IL. [Chow LQM] University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA. [Burgio MA] Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy. [de Castro Carpeno J] Hospital De Madrid, Norte Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain. [Felip E] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid33449799
dc.identifier.wos000635371200005
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record