Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorHarbeck, Nadia
dc.contributor.authorRastogi, P.
dc.contributor.authorMartin, M.
dc.contributor.authorTolaney, Sara M
dc.contributor.authorShao, Zhi Min
dc.contributor.authorCortés Castan, Javier
dc.contributor.authorFasching, Peter A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-13T09:42:57Z
dc.date.available2022-06-13T09:42:57Z
dc.date.issued2021-12
dc.identifier.citationHarbeck N, Rastogi P, Martin M, Tolaney SM, Shao ZM, Fasching PA, et al. Adjuvant Abemaciclib Combined With Endocrine Therapy for High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: Updated Efficacy and Ki-67 Analysis From the monarchE Study. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1571–81.
dc.identifier.issn0923-7534
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/7662
dc.descriptionAbemaciclib; Adjuvant; Early breast cancer
dc.description.abstractBackground Adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) previously demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer at the second interim analysis, however follow-up was limited. Here, we present results of the prespecified primary outcome analysis and an additional follow-up analysis. Patients and methods This global, phase III, open-label trial randomized (1 : 1) 5637 patients to adjuvant ET for ≥5 years ± abemaciclib for 2 years. Cohort 1 enrolled patients with ≥4 positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs), or 1-3 positive ALNs and either grade 3 disease or tumor ≥5 cm. Cohort 2 enrolled patients with 1-3 positive ALNs and centrally determined high Ki-67 index (≥20%). The primary endpoint was IDFS in the intent-to-treat population (cohorts 1 and 2). Secondary endpoints were IDFS in patients with high Ki-67, DRFS, overall survival, and safety. Results At the primary outcome analysis, with 19 months median follow-up time, abemaciclib + ET resulted in a 29% reduction in the risk of developing an IDFS event [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.87; nominal P = 0.0009]. At the additional follow-up analysis, with 27 months median follow-up and 90% of patients off treatment, IDFS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.59-0.82; nominal P < 0.0001) and DRFS (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.57-0.83; nominal P < 0.0001) benefit was maintained. The absolute improvements in 3-year IDFS and DRFS rates were 5.4% and 4.2%, respectively. Whereas Ki-67 index was prognostic, abemaciclib benefit was consistent regardless of Ki-67 index. Safety data were consistent with the known abemaciclib risk profile. Conclusion Abemaciclib + ET significantly improved IDFS in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer, with an acceptable safety profile. Ki-67 index was prognostic, but abemaciclib benefit was observed regardless of Ki-67 index. Overall, the robust treatment benefit of abemaciclib extended beyond the 2-year treatment period.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnnals of Oncology;32(12)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectMama - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectQuimioteràpia combinada
dc.subject.meshBreast Neoplasms
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subject.mesh/therapeutic use
dc.titleAdjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy for high-risk early breast cancer: updated efficacy and Ki-67 analysis from the monarchE study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.015
dc.subject.decsneoplasias de la mama
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsprotocolos de quimioterapia antineoplásica combinada
dc.subject.decs/uso terapéutico
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.015
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Harbeck N] Breast Center, Department of OB & GYN and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany. [Rastogi P] University of Pittsburgh/UPMC, NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, USA. [Martin M] Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Universidad Complutense, CIBERONC, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain. [Tolaney SM] Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA. [Shao ZM] Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. [Fasching PA] University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. [Cortés J] International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Madrid & Barcelona. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Madrid, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid34656740
dc.identifier.wos000721610600014
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record