dc.contributor | Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus |
dc.contributor.author | Simoncini, Tommaso |
dc.contributor.author | Panattoni, Andrea |
dc.contributor.author | Aktas, Mustafa |
dc.contributor.author | Ampe, Joze |
dc.contributor.author | Betschart, Cornelia |
dc.contributor.author | Bloemendaal, Alexander |
dc.contributor.author | Espin-Basany, Eloy |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-10T07:57:29Z |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-10T07:57:29Z |
dc.date.issued | 2023-07 |
dc.identifier.citation | Simoncini T, Panattoni A, Aktas M, Ampe J, Betschart C, Bloemendaal ALA, et al. Robot-assisted pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: an international Delphi study of expert users. Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37:5215–25. |
dc.identifier.issn | 1432-2218 |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11351/10076 |
dc.description | Delphi consensus; Pelvic organ prolapse; Robotic surgery |
dc.description.abstract | Background
Robotic surgery has gained popularity for the reconstruction of pelvic floor defects. Nonetheless, there is no evidence that robot-assisted reconstructive surgery is either appropriate or superior to standard laparoscopy for the performance of pelvic floor reconstructive procedures or that it is sustainable. The aim of this project was to address the proper role of robotic pelvic floor reconstructive procedures using expert opinion.
Methods
We set up an international, multidisciplinary group of 26 experts to participate in a Delphi process on robotics as applied to pelvic floor reconstructive surgery. The group comprised urogynecologists, urologists, and colorectal surgeons with long-term experience in the performance of pelvic floor reconstructive procedures and with the use of the robot, who were identified primarily based on peer-reviewed publications. Two rounds of the Delphi process were conducted. The first included 63 statements pertaining to surgeons’ characteristics, general questions, indications, surgical technique, and future-oriented questions. A second round including 20 statements was used to reassess those statements where borderline agreement was obtained during the first round. The final step consisted of a face-to-face meeting with all participants to present and discuss the results of the analysis.
Results
The 26 experts agreed that robotics is a suitable indication for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery because of the significant technical advantages that it confers relative to standard laparoscopy. Experts considered these advantages particularly important for the execution of complex reconstructive procedures, although the benefits can be found also during less challenging cases. The experts considered the robot safe and effective for pelvic floor reconstruction and generally thought that the additional costs are offset by the increased surgical efficacy.
Conclusion
Robotics is a suitable choice for pelvic reconstruction, but this Delphi initiative calls for more research to objectively assess the specific settings where robotic surgery would provide the most benefit. |
dc.language.iso | eng |
dc.publisher | Springer |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Surgical Endoscopy;37 |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
dc.source | Scientia |
dc.subject | Decisió de grup |
dc.subject | Sòl pelvià - Cirurgia |
dc.subject | Robòtica en medicina |
dc.subject.mesh | Delphi Technique |
dc.subject.mesh | Robotic Surgical Procedures |
dc.subject.mesh | Pelvic Floor |
dc.subject.mesh | /surgery |
dc.title | Robot-assisted pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: an international Delphi study of expert users |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00464-023-10001-4 |
dc.subject.decs | técnica Delfos |
dc.subject.decs | procedimientos quirúrgicos robotizados |
dc.subject.decs | diafragma pélvico |
dc.subject.decs | /cirugía |
dc.relation.publishversion | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10001-4 |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.audience | Professionals |
dc.contributor.organismes | Institut Català de la Salut |
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation | [Simoncini T, Panattoni A] Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. [Aktas M] Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. [Ampe J] Department of Urology, AZ Sint-Jan Bruges Hospitals, Brugge, Belgium. [Betschart C] Department of Gynecology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. [Bloemendaal ALA] Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands. [Espin-Basany E] Unitat de Cirurgia de Còlon i Recte, Servei de Cirurgia General i Digestiva, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain |
dc.identifier.pmid | 36952046 |
dc.identifier.wos | 000958220100006 |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |