Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorJaikuna, Tanwiwat
dc.contributor.authorVasquez Osorio, Eliana M
dc.contributor.authorAzria, David
dc.contributor.authorChang-Claude, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorDe Santis, Maria Carmen
dc.contributor.authorSeoane Ramallo, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Enríquez, Sara
dc.contributor.authorReyes López, Victoria
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-19T09:29:53Z
dc.date.available2023-09-19T09:29:53Z
dc.date.issued2023-12
dc.identifier.citationJaikuna T, Vasquez Osorio E, Azria D, Chang-Claude J, De Santis MC, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, et al. Contouring variation affects estimates of normal tissue complication probability for breast fibrosis after radiotherapy. The Breast. 2023 Dec;72:103578.
dc.identifier.issn0960-9776
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/10309
dc.descriptionBreast cancer; Fibrosis; Late effects
dc.description.abstractBackground Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models can be useful to estimate the risk of fibrosis after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (RT) to the breast. However, they are subject to uncertainties. We present the impact of contouring variation on the prediction of fibrosis. Materials and methods 280 breast cancer patients treated BCS-RT were included. Nine Clinical Target Volume (CTV) contours were created for each patient: i) CTV_crop (reference), cropped 5 mm from the skin and ii) CTV_skin, uncropped and including the skin, iii) segmenting the 95% isodose (Iso95%) and iv) 3 different auto-contouring atlases generating uncropped and cropped contours (Atlas_skin/Atlas_crop). To illustrate the impact of contour variation on NTCP estimates, we applied two equations predicting fibrosis grade 2 at 5 years, based on Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) and Relative Seriality (RS) models, respectively, to each contour. Differences were evaluated using repeated-measures ANOVA. For completeness, the association between observed fibrosis events and NTCP estimates was also evaluated using logistic regression. Results There were minimal differences between contours when the same contouring approach was followed (cropped and uncropped). CTV_skin and Atlas_skin contours had lower NTCP estimates (−3.92%, IQR 4.00, p < 0.05) compared to CTV_crop. No significant difference was observed for Atlas_crop and Iso95% contours compared to CTV_crop. For the whole cohort, NTCP estimates varied between 5.3% and 49.5% (LKB) or 2.2% and 49.6% (RS) depending on the choice of contours. NTCP estimates for individual patients varied by up to a factor of 4. Estimates from “skin” contours showed higher agreement with observed events. Conclusion Contour variations can lead to significantly different NTCP estimates for breast fibrosis, highlighting the importance of standardising breast contours before developing and/or applying NTCP models.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe Breast;72
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectMama - Càncer - Radioteràpia - Complicacions
dc.subjectMama - Càncer - Cirurgia - Complicacions
dc.subjectMama - Fibrosi
dc.subject.meshBreast Neoplasms
dc.subject.mesh/radiotherapy
dc.subject.meshFibrosis
dc.titleContouring variation affects estimates of normal tissue complication probability for breast fibrosis after radiotherapy
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.breast.2023.103578
dc.subject.decsneoplasias de la mama
dc.subject.decs/radioterapia
dc.subject.decsfibrosis
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2023.103578
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Jaikuna T] Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Christie NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom. Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. [Vasquez Osorio E] Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Christie NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom. [Azria D] Department of Radiation Oncology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Université Montpellier, Inserm, France. [Chang-Claude J] Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. [De Santis MC] Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Isituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. [Gutiérrez-Enríquez S] Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Seoane A] Servei de Física i Protecció Radiològica, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Reyes V] Servei d’Oncologia Radioteràpica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid37713940
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record