Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorConsorci Sanitari de Terrassa
dc.contributor.authorGrau, Teodoro
dc.contributor.authorMor-Marco, Esther
dc.contributor.authorPortugal-Rodriguez, Esther
dc.contributor.authorLorencio, Carol
dc.contributor.authorIglesias-Rodriguez, Rayden
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Delgado, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.authorSANCHEZ ALES, LAURA
dc.contributor.authorBordeje, Mª Luisa
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-18T13:29:30Z
dc.date.available2023-12-18T13:29:30Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-03
dc.identifier.citationLopez-Delgado JC, Grau-Carmona T, Mor-Marco E, Bordeje-Laguna ML, Portugal-Rodriguez E, Lorencio-Cardenas C, et al. Parenteral Nutrition: Current Use, Complications, and Nutrition Delivery in Critically Ill Patients. Nutrients. 2023 Nov 3;15(21):4665.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/10703
dc.descriptionComplementary parenteral nutrition; Critically ill patients; Enteral nutrition
dc.description.abstractBackground: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is needed to avoid the development of malnutrition when enteral nutrition (EN) is not possible. Our main aim was to assess the current use, complications, and nutrition delivery associated with PN administration in adult critically ill patients, especially when used early and as the initial route. We also assessed the differences between patients who received only PN and those in whom EN was initiated after PN (PN-EN). Methods: A multicenter (n = 37) prospective observational study was performed. Patient clinical characteristics, outcomes, and nutrition-related variables were recorded. Statistical differences between subgroups were analyzed accordingly. Results: From the entire population (n = 629), 186 (29.6%) patients received PN as initial nutrition therapy. Of these, 74 patients (11.7%) also received EN during their ICU stay (i.e., PN-EN subgroup). PN was administered early (<48 h) in the majority of patients (75.3%; n = 140) and the mean caloric (19.94 ± 6.72 Kcal/kg/day) and protein (1.01 ± 0.41 g/kg/day) delivery was similar to other contemporary studies. PN showed similar nutritional delivery when compared with the enteral route. No significant complications were associated with the use of PN. Thirty-two patients (43.3%) presented with EN-related complications in the PN-EN subgroup but received a higher mean protein delivery (0.95 ± 0.43 vs 1.17 ± 0.36 g/kg/day; p = 0.03) compared with PN alone. Once adjusted for confounding factors, patients who received PN alone had a lower mean protein intake (hazard ratio (HR): 0.29; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18-0.47; p = 0.001), shorter ICU stay (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.91-0.99; p = 0.008), and fewer days on mechanical ventilation (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.81-0.89; p = 0.001) compared with the PN-EN subgroup. Conclusion: The parenteral route may be safe, even when administered early, and may provide adequate nutrition delivery. Additional EN, when possible, may optimize protein requirements, especially in more severe patients who received initial PN and are expected to have longer ICU stays. NCT Registry: 03634943.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNutrients;15(21)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectNutrició parenteral
dc.subjectMalalts en estat crític
dc.subject.meshParenteral Nutrition
dc.subject.meshCritical Illness
dc.titleParenteral Nutrition: Current Use, Complications, and Nutrition Delivery in Critically Ill Patients
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/nu15214665
dc.subject.decsnutrición parenteral
dc.subject.decsenfermedad crítica
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/nu15214665
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Lopez-Delgado JC] Hospital Clinic, Medical ICU, Clinical Institute of Internal Medicine & Dermatology, Barcelona, Spain. Biomedical Investigation Institute of Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. [Grau-Carmona T] Intensive Care Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. i+12 (Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre), Madrid, Spain. [Mor-Marco E, Bordeje-Laguna ML] Intensive Care Department, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain. [Portugal-Rodriguez E] Intensive Care Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain. [Lorencio-Cardenas C] Intensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain. [Iglesias-Rodriguez R] Intensive Care Department, Hospital General de Granollers, Granollers, Spain. [Sanchez-Ales L] Servei de Cures Intensives, Hospital de Terrassa, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record