Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorAjani, Jaffer A
dc.contributor.authorFARID, EL HAJBI
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, David
dc.contributor.authorThuss-Patience, Peter
dc.contributor.authorScagliotti, Giorgio
dc.contributor.authorAlsina, Maria
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-31T13:05:04Z
dc.date.available2024-01-31T13:05:04Z
dc.date.issued2024-01
dc.identifier.citationAjani J, El Hajbi F, Cunningham D, Alsina M, Thuss-Patience P, Scagliotti GV, et al. Tislelizumab versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment for European and North American patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a subgroup analysis of the randomized phase III RATIONALE-302 study. ESMO Open. 2024 Jan;9(1):102202.
dc.identifier.issn2059-7029
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/10941
dc.descriptionEsophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Tislelizumab
dc.description.abstractBackground The phase III RATIONALE-302 study evaluated tislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, as second-line (2L) treatment for advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This prespecified exploratory analysis investigated outcomes in patients from Europe and North America (Europe/North America subgroup). Patients and methods Patients with tumor progression during/after first-line systemic treatment were randomized 1 : 1 to open-label tislelizumab or investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan). Results The Europe/North America subgroup comprised 108 patients (tislelizumab: n = 55; chemotherapy: n = 53). Overall survival (OS) was prolonged with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy (median: 11.2 versus 6.3 months), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.87]; HR was similar irrespective of programmed death-ligand 1 score [≥10%: 0.47 (95% CI 0.18-1.21); <10%: 0.55 (95% CI 0.30-1.01)]. Median progression-free survival was 2.3 versus 2.7 months with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy [HR: 0.97 (95% CI 0.64-1.47)]. Overall response rate was greater with tislelizumab (20.0%) versus chemotherapy (11.3%), with more durable response (median duration of response: 5.1 versus 2.1 months). Tislelizumab had a favorable safety profile versus chemotherapy, with fewer patients experiencing ≥grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (13.0% versus 51.0%). Those on tislelizumab experienced less deterioration in health-related quality of life, physical functioning, and/or disease- and treatment-related symptoms (i.e. fatigue, pain, and eating problems) as compared to those on chemotherapy, per the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and QLQ-OES18 scores. Conclusions As a 2L therapy for advanced/metastatic ESCC, tislelizumab improved OS and had a favorable safety profile as compared to chemotherapy in European/North American ESCC patients in the randomized phase III RATIONALE-302 study.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesESMO Open;9(1)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectEsòfag - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectAnticossos monoclonals - Ús terapèutic
dc.subjectQuimioteràpia
dc.subject.meshEsophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
dc.titleTislelizumab versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment for European and North American patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a subgroup analysis of the randomized phase III RATIONALE-302 study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102202
dc.subject.decscarcinoma de células escamosas de esófago
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsanticuerpos monoclonales humanizados
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102202
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Ajani J] Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA. [El Hajbi F] Department of Gastro-intestinal Oncology, Oscar Lambert Center, Lille, France. [Cunningham D] Department of Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. [Alsina M] Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Thuss-Patience P] Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany. [Scagliotti GV] Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Orbassano, Torino, Italy
dc.identifier.pmid38118368
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record