| dc.contributor | Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus |
| dc.contributor.author | Ajani, Jaffer A |
| dc.contributor.author | FARID, EL HAJBI |
| dc.contributor.author | Cunningham, David |
| dc.contributor.author | Thuss-Patience, Peter |
| dc.contributor.author | Scagliotti, Giorgio |
| dc.contributor.author | Alsina, Maria |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-31T13:05:04Z |
| dc.date.available | 2024-01-31T13:05:04Z |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-01 |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ajani J, El Hajbi F, Cunningham D, Alsina M, Thuss-Patience P, Scagliotti GV, et al. Tislelizumab versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment for European and North American patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a subgroup analysis of the randomized phase III RATIONALE-302 study. ESMO Open. 2024 Jan;9(1):102202. |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2059-7029 |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11351/10941 |
| dc.description | Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Tislelizumab |
| dc.description.abstract | Background
The phase III RATIONALE-302 study evaluated tislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, as second-line (2L) treatment for advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This prespecified exploratory analysis investigated outcomes in patients from Europe and North America (Europe/North America subgroup).
Patients and methods
Patients with tumor progression during/after first-line systemic treatment were randomized 1 : 1 to open-label tislelizumab or investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan).
Results
The Europe/North America subgroup comprised 108 patients (tislelizumab: n = 55; chemotherapy: n = 53). Overall survival (OS) was prolonged with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy (median: 11.2 versus 6.3 months), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.87]; HR was similar irrespective of programmed death-ligand 1 score [≥10%: 0.47 (95% CI 0.18-1.21); <10%: 0.55 (95% CI 0.30-1.01)]. Median progression-free survival was 2.3 versus 2.7 months with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy [HR: 0.97 (95% CI 0.64-1.47)]. Overall response rate was greater with tislelizumab (20.0%) versus chemotherapy (11.3%), with more durable response (median duration of response: 5.1 versus 2.1 months). Tislelizumab had a favorable safety profile versus chemotherapy, with fewer patients experiencing ≥grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (13.0% versus 51.0%). Those on tislelizumab experienced less deterioration in health-related quality of life, physical functioning, and/or disease- and treatment-related symptoms (i.e. fatigue, pain, and eating problems) as compared to those on chemotherapy, per the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and QLQ-OES18 scores.
Conclusions
As a 2L therapy for advanced/metastatic ESCC, tislelizumab improved OS and had a favorable safety profile as compared to chemotherapy in European/North American ESCC patients in the randomized phase III RATIONALE-302 study. |
| dc.language.iso | eng |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | ESMO Open;9(1) |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| dc.source | Scientia |
| dc.subject | Esòfag - Càncer - Tractament |
| dc.subject | Anticossos monoclonals - Ús terapèutic |
| dc.subject | Quimioteràpia |
| dc.subject.mesh | Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
| dc.subject.mesh | /drug therapy |
| dc.subject.mesh | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |
| dc.title | Tislelizumab versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment for European and North American patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a subgroup analysis of the randomized phase III RATIONALE-302 study |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102202 |
| dc.subject.decs | carcinoma de células escamosas de esófago |
| dc.subject.decs | /farmacoterapia |
| dc.subject.decs | anticuerpos monoclonales humanizados |
| dc.relation.publishversion | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102202 |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.audience | Professionals |
| dc.contributor.organismes | Institut Català de la Salut |
| dc.contributor.authoraffiliation | [Ajani J] Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA. [El Hajbi F] Department of Gastro-intestinal Oncology, Oscar Lambert Center, Lille, France. [Cunningham D] Department of Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. [Alsina M] Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Thuss-Patience P] Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany. [Scagliotti GV] Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Orbassano, Torino, Italy |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 38118368 |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |