Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorMutch, David
dc.contributor.authorVoulgari, Athina
dc.contributor.authorChen, Xian (Marissa)
dc.contributor.authorBradley, William
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Fidalgo, J. Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorOAKNIN, ANA
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-31T10:29:29Z
dc.date.available2024-05-31T10:29:29Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-01
dc.identifier.citationMutch D, Voulgari A, Chen XM, Bradley WH, Oaknin A, Perez Fidalgo JA, et al. Primary results and characterization of patients with exceptional outcomes in a phase 1b study combining PARP and MEK inhibition, with or without anti–PD-L1, for BRCA wild-type, platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2024 Jun 1;130(11):1940–51.
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/11533
dc.descriptionMEK inhibitor; PARP Inhibitor; Ovarian cancer
dc.description.abstractBackground This phase 1b study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03695380) evaluated regimens combining PARP and MEK inhibition, with or without PD-L1 inhibition, for BRCA wild-type, platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC). Methods Patients with PSROC who had received one or two prior treatment lines were treated with 28-day cycles of cobimetinib 60 mg daily (days 1–21) plus niraparib 200 mg daily (days 1–28) with or without atezolizumab 840 mg (days 1 and 15). Stage 1 assessed safety before expansion to stage 2, which randomized patients who had BRCA wild-type PSROC to receive either doublet or triplet therapy, stratified by genome-wide loss of heterozygosity status (<16% vs. ≥16%; FoundationOne CDx assay) and platinum-free interval (≥6 to <12 vs. ≥12 months). Coprimary end points were safety and the investigator-determined objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Potential associations between genetic parameters and efficacy were explored, and biomarker profiles of super-responders (complete response or those with progression-free survival [PFS] >15 months) and progressors (disease progression as the best response) were characterized. Results The ORR in patients who had BRCA wild-type PSROC was 35% (95% confidence interval, 20%–53%) with the doublet regimen (n = 37) and 27% (95% confidence interval, 14%–44%) with the triplet regimen (n = 37), and the median PFS was 6.0 and 7.4 months, respectively. Post-hoc analyses indicated more favorable ORR and PFS in the homologous recombination-deficiency-signature (HRDsig)-positive subgroup than in the HRDsig-negative subgroup. Tolerability was consistent with the known profiles of individual agents. NF1 and MKNK1 mutations were associated with sustained benefit from the doublet and triplet regimens, respectively. Conclusions Chemotherapy-free doublet and triplet therapy demonstrated encouraging activity, including among patients who had BRCA wild-type, HRDsig-positive or HRDsig-negative PSROC harboring NF1 or MKNK1 mutations.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCancer;130(11)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectQuimioteràpia combinada
dc.subjectOvaris - Càncer - Immunoteràpia
dc.subjectAnticossos monoclonals - Ús terapèutic
dc.subject.meshOvarian Neoplasms
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Agents, Immunological
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subject.meshAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
dc.titlePrimary results and characterization of patients with exceptional outcomes in a phase 1b study combining PARP and MEK inhibition, with or without anti–PD-L1, for BRCA wild-type, platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.35222
dc.subject.decsneoplasias ováricas
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsinmunoterapia antineoplásica
dc.subject.decsprotocolos de quimioterapia antineoplásica combinada
dc.subject.decsanticuerpos monoclonales humanizados
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35222
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Mutch D] Division of Gynecology Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA. [Voulgari A] Global Product Development Clinical Science, Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, UK. [Chen XM] Translational Medicine, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA. [Bradley WH] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA. [Oaknin A] Medical Oncology Service, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Perez Fidalgo JA] Hospital Clínico Universitario Valencia, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Valencia, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid38288862
dc.identifier.wos001153827700001
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record