Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorVALABREGA, Giorgio
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Erika
dc.contributor.authorSehouli, Jalid
dc.contributor.authorFariñas-Madrid, Lorena
dc.contributor.authorMakker, Vicky
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Fidalgo, J. Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorVan Gorp, Toon
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-14T08:12:55Z
dc.date.available2024-06-14T08:12:55Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-03
dc.identifier.citationMakker V, Perez-Fidalgo JA, Valabrega G, Hamilton E, Van Gorp T, Sehouli J, et al. Long-term follow-up of efficacy and safety of selinexor maintenance treatment in patients with TP53wt advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: A subgroup analysis of the ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055/SIENDO study. Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Jun 3;185:202–11.
dc.identifier.issn0090-8258
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/11589
dc.descriptionCancer biomarker; Endometrial neoplasm; P53 tumor-suppressor protein
dc.description.abstractObjective: To report long-term efficacy and safety of selinexor maintenance therapy in adults with TP53 wild-type (TP53wt) stage IV or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) who achieved partial remission (PR) or complete remission (CR) following chemotherapy. Methods: Analysis of the prespecified, exploratory subgroup of patients with TP53wt EC from the phase 3 SIENDO study was performed. Progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in patients with TP53wt EC and across other patient subgroups were exploratory endpoints. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results: Of the 263 patients enrolled in the SIENDO trial, 113 patients had TP53wt EC; 70/113 (61.9%) had TP53wt/proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) EC, and 29/113 (25.7%) had TP53wt/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) EC. As of April 1, 2024, the median PFS (mPFS) for TP53wt patients who received selinexor compared with placebo was 28.4 versus 5.2 months (36.8-month follow-up, HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.27-0.73). A benefit in mPFS was seen with selinexor versus placebo regardless of MMR status (patients with TP53wt/pMMR EC: 39.5 vs 4.9 months, HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.19-0.71; patients with TP53wt/dMMR EC: 13.1 vs 3.7 months, HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.18-1.34). Selinexor treatment was generally manageable, with no new safety signals identified. Conclusion: In the phase 3 SIENDO study, selinexor maintenance therapy showed a promising efficacy signal and a manageable safety profile in the prespecified subgroup of patients with TP53wt EC who achieved a PR or CR following chemotherapy. These results are being further evaluated in an ongoing randomized phase 3 trial (NCT05611931).
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGynecologic Oncology;185
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectMedicaments antineoplàstics - Ús terapèutic
dc.subjectEndometri - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectAvaluació de resultats (Assistència sanitària)
dc.subject.meshEndometrial Neoplasms
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Agents
dc.titleLong-term follow-up of efficacy and safety of selinexor maintenance treatment in patients with TP53wt advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: A subgroup analysis of the ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055/SIENDO study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.016
dc.subject.decsneoplasias endometriales
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsresultado del tratamiento
dc.subject.decsantineoplásicos
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.016
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Makker V] Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. [Perez-Fidalgo JA] INCLIVA, CIBERONC, GEICO, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain. [Valabrega G] University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin, Italy. [Hamilton E] Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA. [Van Gorp T] Belgium and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG), Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. [Sehouli J] European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, NOGGO, Charité–Berlin University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany. [Fariñas-Madrid L] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid38834399
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record