Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorBaranda, Joaquina
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Ryan
dc.contributor.authorDoger, B
dc.contributor.authorSantoro, Armando
dc.contributor.authorBarve, Minal
dc.contributor.authorRobbrecht, Debbie
dc.contributor.authorVieito , Maria
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-26T11:16:00Z
dc.date.available2024-06-26T11:16:00Z
dc.date.issued2024-06
dc.identifier.citationBaranda JC, Robbrecht D, Sullivan R, Doger B, Santoro A, Barve M, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of SAR439459, a TGFβ inhibitor, as monotherapy and in combination with cemiplimab in patients with advanced solid tumors: Findings from a phase 1/1b study. Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jun;17(6):e13854.
dc.identifier.issn1752-8062
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/11627
dc.descriptionPharmacokinetics; Antitumor activity; Advanced solid tumors
dc.description.abstractSAR439459 (SAR'459), a “second-generation” human anti-transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) monoclonal antibody, enhances the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this phase I/Ib study, we evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of SAR'459 ± cemiplimab (intravenous) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Increasing doses of SAR'459 were administered every 2 or 3 weeks (Q2W, Q3W) alone (Part 1A) or with 3 mg/kg cemiplimab Q2W or 350 mg Q3W (Part 1B). In Part 2A (dose expansion), melanoma patients were randomly (1:1) administered 22.5 or 7.5 mg/kg SAR'459. In Part 2B (dose expansion), 22.5 mg/kg SAR'459 and 350 mg cemiplimab Q3W were administered. The primary end points were maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD; Part 1), preliminary antitumor activity (Part 2B), and optimal monotherapy dose (Part 2A). Twenty-eight and 24 patients were treated in Parts 1A and 1B, respectively; MTD was not reached, MAD was 15 (Q2W) and 22.5 mg/kg (Q3W) alone and in combination, respectively. Fourteen and 95 patients, including 14 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, were treated in Parts 2A and 2B, respectively. The population PK model yielded satisfactory goodness-of-fit plots and adequately described the observed data by a two-compartment PK model with linear elimination. Objective responses were not observed in Parts 1 and 2A. In Part 2B, objective response rate was 8.4% and 7.1% across tumor types and the HCC cohort, respectively. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse effects were hemorrhagic events (43.5%), keratoacanthoma (6.8%), and skin neoplasms (6.2%). Fatal bleeding occurred in 21.4% HCC patients despite the implementation of mitigation measures. SAR'459 monotherapy and combination with cemiplimab appeared relatively safe and tolerable in limited number of patients in dose escalation. However, the study was discontinued due to the unclear efficacy of SAR'459 and bleeding risk, particularly in HCC patients.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofseriesClinical and Translational Science;17(6)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectCàncer - Tractament
dc.subjectFactors de creixement - Inhibidors
dc.subjectAnticossos monoclonals - Ús terapèutic
dc.subject.meshAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
dc.subject.meshTransforming Growth Factor beta
dc.subject.mesh/antagonists & inhibitors
dc.subject.meshNeoplasms
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.titleSafety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of SAR439459, a TGFβ inhibitor, as monotherapy and in combination with cemiplimab in patients with advanced solid tumors: Findings from a phase 1/1b study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cts.13854
dc.subject.decsanticuerpos monoclonales humanizados
dc.subject.decsfactor de crecimiento transformador beta
dc.subject.decs/antagonistas & inhibidores
dc.subject.decsneoplasias
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13854
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Baranda JC] Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Fairway, Kansas, USA. [Robbrecht D] Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. [Sullivan R] Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [Doger B] START Madrid Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain. [Santoro A] Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University Via Rita Levi Montalcini, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy. IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital-Humanitas Cancer Center Via Manzoni, Rozzano, Milan, Italy. [Barve M] Mary Crowley Cancer Research, Dallas, Texas, USA. [Vieito M] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) Spain, Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid38898592
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record