Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorStojanovic, Goran
dc.contributor.authorSpigel, David
dc.contributor.authorDowlati, Afshin
dc.contributor.authorNAVARRO, ALEJANDRO
dc.contributor.authorYang, James Chih-Hsin
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yuanbin
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-02T09:28:08Z
dc.date.available2024-07-02T09:28:08Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-01
dc.identifier.citationSpigel DR, Dowlati A, Chen Y, Navarro A, Yang JCH, Stojanovic G, et al. RESILIENT Part 2: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Study of Liposomal Irinotecan Versus Topotecan in Adults With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul 1;42(19):2317–26.
dc.identifier.issn1527-7755
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/11652
dc.descriptionLiposomal Irinotecan; Topotecan; Small cell lung cancer
dc.description.abstractPurpose The phase III RESILIENT trial compared second-line liposomal irinotecan with topotecan in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients and Methods Patients with SCLC and progression on or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous (IV) liposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m2 every 2 weeks in a 6-week cycle) or IV topotecan (1.5 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days, every 3 weeks in a 6-week cycle). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Results Among 461 randomly assigned patients, 229 received liposomal irinotecan and 232 received topotecan. The median follow-up was 18.4 months. The median OS was 7.9 months with liposomal irinotecan versus 8.3 months with topotecan (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.37]; P = .31). The median PFS per blinded independent central review (BICR) was 4.0 months with liposomal irinotecan and 3.3 months with topotecan (HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.20]; nominal P = .71); ORR per BICR was 44.1% (95% CI, 37.6 to 50.8) and 21.6% (16.4 to 27.4), respectively. Overall, 42.0% and 83.4% of patients receiving liposomal irinotecan and topotecan, respectively, experienced grade ≥3 related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most common grade ≥3 related TEAEs were diarrhea (13.7%), neutropenia (8.0%), and decreased neutrophil count (4.4%) with liposomal irinotecan and neutropenia (51.6%), anemia (30.9%), and leukopenia (29.1%) with topotecan. Conclusion Liposomal irinotecan and topotecan demonstrated similar median OS and PFS in patients with relapsed SCLC. Although the primary end point of OS was not met, liposomal irinotecan demonstrated a higher ORR than topotecan. The safety profile of liposomal irinotecan was consistent with its known safety profile; no new safety concerns emerged.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Clinical Oncology;42(19)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectPulmons - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectMedicaments antineoplàstics - Ús terapèutic
dc.subjectInhibidors enzimàtics - Ús terapèutic
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Agents
dc.subject.meshTopoisomerase I Inhibitors
dc.subject.meshCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.titleRESILIENT Part 2: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Study of Liposomal Irinotecan Versus Topotecan in Adults With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.23.02110
dc.subject.decsantineoplásicos
dc.subject.decsinhibidores de la topoisomerasa I
dc.subject.decscarcinoma de pulmón de células no pequeñas
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.02110
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Spigel DR] Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN. [Dowlati A] University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH. [Chen Y] Cancer and Hematology Centers of Western Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI. [Navarro A] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Chih-Hsin Yang J] National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan. [Stojanovic G] Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
dc.identifier.pmid38648575
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record