ECMO for drug-refractory electrical storm without a reversible trigger: a retrospective multicentric observational study
Author
Date
2024-04-11Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/11351/11841DOI
10.1002/ehf2.14756
ISSN
2055-5822
WOS
001200747600001
PMID
38605602
Abstract
Aims
Drug-refractory electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening medical emergency. We describe the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in drug-refractory ES without a reversible trigger, for which specific guideline recommendations are still lacking.
Methods and results
Retrospective observational study in four Iberian centres on the indications, treatment, complications, and outcome of drug-refractory ES not associated with acute coronary syndromes, decompensated heart failure, drug toxicity, electrolyte disturbances, endocrine emergencies, concomitant acute illness with fever, or poor compliance with anti-arrhythmic drugs, requiring VA-ECMO for circulatory support. Thirty-four (6%) out of 552 patients with VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock were included [71% men; 57 (44–62) years], 65% underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation before VA-ECMO implantation, and 26% during cannulation. Left ventricular unloading during VA-ECMO was used in 8 (24%) patients: 3 (9%) with intraaortic balloon pump, 3 (9%) with LV vent, and 2 (6%) with Impella. Thirty (88%) had structural heart disease and 8 (24%) had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. The drug-refractory ES was mostly due to monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) (59%), isolated monomorphic VT (26%), polymorphic VT (9%), or VF (6%). Thirty-one (91%) required deep sedation, 44% overdrive pacing, 36% catheter ablation, and 26% acute autonomic modulation. The main complications were nosocomial infection (47%), bleeding (24%), and limb ischaemia (21%). Eighteen (53%) were weaned from VA-ECMO, and 29% had heart transplantation. Twenty-seven (79%) survived to hospital discharge (48 (33–82) days). Non-survivors were older [62 (58–67) vs. 54 (43–58); P < 0.01] and had a higher first rhythm disorder-to-ECMO interval [0 (0–2) vs. 2 (1-11) days; P = 0.02]. Seven (20%) had rehospitalization during follow-up [29 (12–48) months], with ES recurrence in 6%.
Conclusions
VA-ECMO bridged drug-refractory ES without a reversible trigger with a high success rate. This required prolonged hospital stays and coordination between the ECMO centre, the electrophysiology laboratory, and the heart transplant programme.
Keywords
Catheter ablation; Electrical storm; Heart transplantationBibliographic citation
Durães-Campos I, Costa C, Ferreira AR, Basílio C, Torrella P, Neves A, et al. ECMO for drug-refractory electrical storm without a reversible trigger: a retrospective multicentric observational study. ESC Hear Fail. 2024 Apr;11(4):2129–37.
Audience
Professionals
This item appears in following collections
- HVH - Articles científics [4476]
The following license files are associated with this item:





