Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorBurotto, Mauricio
dc.contributor.authorZvirbule, Zanete
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, Renzo
dc.contributor.authorChewaskulyong, Busayamas
dc.contributor.authorHerraez-Baranda, L.
dc.contributor.authorShearer-Kang, Esther
dc.contributor.authorFELIP, ENRIQUETA
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-08T09:31:18Z
dc.date.available2024-10-08T09:31:18Z
dc.date.issued2024-10
dc.identifier.citationBurotto M, Zvirbule Z, Alvarez R, Chewaskulyong B, Herraez-Baranda LA, Shearer-Kang E, et al. Brief Report: Updated Data From IMscin001 Part 2, a Randomized Phase III Study of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Atezolizumab in Patients With Locally Advanced/Metastatic NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2024 Oct;19(10):1460–6.
dc.identifier.issn1556-0864
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/12034
dc.descriptionAtezolizumab; Intravenous; Subcutaneous
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Subcutaneous atezolizumab is approved for the treatment of various solid tumors. Previous results from the IMscin001 study (NCT03735121) revealed that the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of subcutaneous and intravenous atezolizumab were consistent (data cutoff: April 26, 2022). We present updated data from this trial (data cutoff: January 16, 2023). Methods Eligible patients aged above or equal to 18 years with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomized (2:1) to receive atezolizumab subcutaneously (1875 mg, n = 247) or intravenously (1200 mg, n = 124) every 3 weeks. Here, we present updated efficacy (overall survival [OS]; progression-free survival; objective response rate; duration of response), safety, and immunogenicity end points, alongside patient-reported outcomes and health care practitioner (HCP) perspectives. Results In this updated analysis, the median survival follow-up was 9.5 months. Median subcutaneous injection time was 7.1 minutes, with an average subcutaneous injection time of 4 to 8 minutes in most patients (75.7%). OS data were mature: median OS was similar between treatment arms, at 10.7 and 10.1 months in the subcutaneous and intravenous arms, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.67–1.16). Other efficacy end points, as well as immunogenicity, patient-reported outcomes, and safety, were similar between arms. Most HCPs found subcutaneous administration convenient (79.5%), easy to administer (89.7%), and were satisfied with the treatment (84.6%); 75.0% of HCPs agreed that administering atezolizumab subcutaneously compared with intravenously could save time. Conclusions In this analysis, mature OS data were similar between treatments. The updated efficacy and safety profile of subcutaneous atezolizumab is consistent with previous findings and equivalent to intravenous atezolizumab.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Thoracic Oncology;19(10)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectPulmons - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectAnticossos monoclonals - Ús terapèutic
dc.subjectInjeccions intravenoses
dc.subjectInjeccions hipodèrmiques
dc.subject.meshCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
dc.subject.meshAdministration, Intravenous
dc.subject.meshInjections, Subcutaneous
dc.titleBrief Report: Updated Data From IMscin001 Part 2, a Randomized Phase III Study of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Atezolizumab in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtho.2024.05.005
dc.subject.decscarcinoma de pulmón de células no pequeñas
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsanticuerpos monoclonales humanizados
dc.subject.decsadministración intravenosa
dc.subject.decsinyecciones subcutáneas
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2024.05.005
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Burotto M] Centro de Investigación, Clínica Bradford Hill, Santiago, Chile. [Zvirbule Z] Riga Eastern Clinical University Hospital, Rıga, Latvia [Alvarez R] Centro Médico Monte Carmelo, Arequipa, Peru. [Chewaskulyong B] Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. [Herraez-Baranda LA] F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland. [Shearer-Kang E] Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California. [Felip E] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid38729426
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record