Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorLeighl, Natasha
dc.contributor.authorAkamatsu, Hiroaki
dc.contributor.authorLim, Sun Min
dc.contributor.authorMinchom, Anna
dc.contributor.authorMarmarelis, Melina
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Ying
dc.contributor.authorFELIP, ENRIQUETA
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-23T09:32:11Z
dc.date.available2024-10-23T09:32:11Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-20
dc.identifier.citationLeighl NB, Akamatsu H, Lim SM, Cheng Y, Minchom AR, Marmarelis ME, et al. Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Amivantamab, both in Combination with Lazertinib, in Refractory EGFR-mutated NSCLC: Primary Results from the Phase 3 PALOMA-3 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct 20;42(30):3593–605.
dc.identifier.issn1527-7755
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/12110
dc.descriptionSubcutaneous amivantamab; Non-small cell lung cancer; Refractory epidermal growth factor receptor
dc.description.abstractPurpose Phase III studies of intravenous amivantamab demonstrated efficacy across epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–mutated advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A subcutaneous formulation could improve tolerability and reduce administration time while maintaining efficacy. Patients and Methods Patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC who progressed after osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive subcutaneous or intravenous amivantamab, both combined with lazertinib. Coprimary pharmacokinetic noninferiority end points were trough concentrations (Ctrough; on cycle-2-day-1 or cycle-4-day-1) and cycle-2 area under the curve (AUCD1-D15). Key secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) was a predefined exploratory end point. Results Overall, 418 patients underwent random assignment (subcutaneous group, n = 206; intravenous group, n = 212). Geometric mean ratios of Ctrough for subcutaneous to intravenous amivantamab were 1.15 (90% CI, 1.04 to 1.26) at cycle-2-day-1 and 1.42 (90% CI, 1.27 to 1.61) at cycle-4-day-1; the cycle-2 AUCD1-D15 was 1.03 (90% CI, 0.98 to 1.09). ORR was 30% in the subcutaneous and 33% in the intravenous group; median PFS was 6.1 and 4.3 months, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the subcutaneous versus intravenous group (hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.92; nominal P = .02). Fewer patients in the subcutaneous group experienced infusion-related reactions (IRRs; 13% v 66%) and venous thromboembolism (9% v 14%) versus the intravenous group. Median administration time for the first infusion was reduced to 4.8 minutes (range, 0-18) for subcutaneous amivantamab and to 5 hours (range, 0.2-9.9) for intravenous amivantamab. During cycle-1-day-1, 85% and 52% of patients in the subcutaneous and intravenous groups, respectively, considered treatment convenient; the end-of-treatment rates were 85% and 35%, respectively. Conclusion Subcutaneous amivantamab-lazertinib demonstrated noninferiority to intravenous amivantamab-lazertinib, offering a consistent safety profile with reduced IRRs, increased convenience, and prolonged survival.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Clinical Oncology;42(30)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectAnomalies cromosòmiques
dc.subjectPulmons - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectQuimioteràpia combinada
dc.subjectTeràpia intravenosa
dc.subject.meshMutation
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subject.meshCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
dc.subject.meshAdministration, Intravenous
dc.titleSubcutaneous Versus Intravenous Amivantamab, Both in Combination With Lazertinib, in Refractory Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Primary Results From the Phase III PALOMA-3 Study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.24.01001
dc.subject.decsmutación
dc.subject.decsprotocolos de quimioterapia antineoplásica combinada
dc.subject.decscarcinoma de pulmón de células no pequeñas
dc.subject.decsadministración intravenosa
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.01001
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Leighl NB] Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. [Akamatsu H] Internal Medicine III, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan. [Lim SM] Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. [Cheng Y] Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun, China. [Minchom AR] Drug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom. [Marmarelis ME] Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. [Felip E] Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VIHO), Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid38857463
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record