Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sung-Bae
dc.contributor.authorBarrios, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorO'Shaughnessy, Joyce
dc.contributor.authorIsakoff, Steven
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Mafalda
dc.contributor.authorDent, Rebecca
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-14T13:42:41Z
dc.date.available2024-11-14T13:42:41Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-01
dc.identifier.citationDent RA, Kim SB, Oliveira M, Barrios C, O’Shaughnessy J, Isakoff SJ, et al. Ipatasertib plus Paclitaxel for Patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-Altered Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in the IPATunity130 Phase III Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Oct 1;30(19):4329-38.
dc.identifier.issn1557-3265
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/12225
dc.descriptionIpatasertib: Triple-negative breast cancer
dc.description.abstractPurpose: In the randomized phase II LOTUS trial, combining ipatasertib with first-line paclitaxel for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) improved progression-free survival (PFS), particularly in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors. We aimed to validate these findings in a biomarker-selected TNBC population. Patients and Methods: In Cohort A of the randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase III IPATunity130 trial, taxane-eligible patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered measurable advanced TNBC and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease were randomized 2:1 to ipatasertib (400 mg, days 1–21) or placebo, both plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2, days 1, 8, and 15), every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. Results: Between February 2018 and April 2020, 255 patients were randomized (168 to ipatasertib, 87 to placebo). At the primary analysis, there was no significant difference between treatment arms in PFS [hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71–1.45; median 7.4 months with ipatasertib vs. 6.1 months with placebo]. The final analysis showed no difference in overall survival between treatment arms (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI, 0.73–1.58; median 24.4 vs. 24.9 months, respectively). Ipatasertib was associated with more grade ≥3 diarrhea (9% vs. 2%) and adverse events leading to dose reduction (39% vs. 14%) but similar incidences of grade ≥3 adverse events (51% vs. 46%). Exploratory subgroup analyses by PAM50 and Burstein gene expression showed inconsistent results. Conclusions: Adding ipatasertib to paclitaxel did not improve efficacy in PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered advanced TNBC. Biomarkers for benefit from PI3K/AKT pathway inhibition in TNBC remain poorly understood.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmerican Association for Cancer Research
dc.relation.ispartofseriesClinical Cancer Research;30(19)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectMama - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectQuimioteràpia combinada
dc.subjectMarcadors tumorals
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subject.meshTriple Negative Breast Neoplasms
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshBiomarkers, Tumor
dc.titleIpatasertib plus Paclitaxel for Patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-Altered Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in the IPATunity130 Phase III Trial
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-0465
dc.subject.decsprotocolos de quimioterapia antineoplásica combinada
dc.subject.decsneoplasias de mama triple negativos
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsmarcadores tumorales
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-0465
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Dent RA] Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. [Kim SB] Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. [Oliveira M] Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Breast Cancer Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Barrios C] Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Oncoclínicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil. [O’Shaughnessy J] Department of Medical Oncology, Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, Texas. [Isakoff SJ] Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
dc.identifier.pmid39058425
dc.identifier.wos001325875500003
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record