Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorFléchon, Aude
dc.contributor.authorALVA, AJJAI
dc.contributor.authorPowles, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorÖZGÜROGLU, MUSTAFA
dc.contributor.authorCsoszi, Tibor
dc.contributor.authorMorales-Barrera, Rafael
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-10T10:26:27Z
dc.date.available2024-12-10T10:26:27Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-01
dc.identifier.citationFléchon A, Morales-Barrera R, Powles T, Alva A, Özgüroğlu M, Csöszi T, et al. Association of Tumor Mutational Burden and PD-L1 with the Efficacy of Pembrolizumab with or without Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Dec 1;30(23):5353–64.
dc.identifier.issn1557-3265
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/12317
dc.descriptionTumor mutational burden; Chemotherapy; Advanced urothelial carcinoma
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The three-arm, phase III KEYNOTE-361 study did not meet its dual primary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) with first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma. This prespecified exploratory analysis assessed the association of tumor mutational burden (TMB) and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) with clinical outcomes. Patients and Methods: TMB and PD-L1 CPS were determined via whole-exome sequencing and PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx, respectively. The association was evaluated in each treatment arm using logistic regression [objective response rate (ORR)] and Cox proportional hazards regression models (PFS and OS); one-sided (pembrolizumab monotherapy; pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy) and two-sided (chemotherapy) nominal P values were calculated. Significance was prespecified at α = 0.05 without multiplicity adjustment. Efficacy was evaluated by prespecified cutoffs of 175 mutations/exome (TMB) and CPS 10 (PD-L1). Results: Of the 993 treated patients, 820 (82.6%) and 993 (100%) had evaluable TMB and CPS data, respectively. Continuous TMB was positively associated with ORR, PFS, and OS for pembrolizumab monotherapy (one-sided P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.007, respectively); PFS and OS for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (one-sided P = 0.007 and P = 0.010, respectively); and OS for chemotherapy alone (two-sided P = 0.040). Continuous PD-L1 CPS showed evidence of anticipated association with ORR and PFS for pembrolizumab monotherapy. The subgroup with TMB ≥175 mutations/exome and PD-L1 CPS ≥10 had the highest PFS and OS improvements with pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. Conclusions: These data suggest that TMB may be predictive of the response to pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmerican Association for Cancer Research
dc.relation.ispartofseriesClinical Cancer Research;30(23)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectMarcadors tumorals
dc.subjectQuimioteràpia combinada
dc.subjectMedicaments antineoplàstics - Ús terapèutic
dc.subjectAnticossos monoclonals - Ús terapèutic
dc.subjectBufeta - Càncer - Aspectes genètics
dc.subjectBufeta - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subject.meshBiomarkers, Tumor
dc.subject.meshAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Agents, Immunological
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subject.meshUrologic Neoplasms
dc.titleAssociation of Tumor Mutational Burden and PD-L1 with the Efficacy of Pembrolizumab with or without Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-3518
dc.subject.decsmarcadores tumorales
dc.subject.decsanticuerpos monoclonales humanizados
dc.subject.decsinmunoterapia antineoplásica
dc.subject.decsprotocolos de quimioterapia antineoplásica combinada
dc.subject.decsneoplasias urológicas
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-3518
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Fléchon A] Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. [Morales-Barrera R] Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. [Powles T] Barts Cancer Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Barts Cancer Institute, Barts Health NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom. [Alva A] University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. [Özgüroğlu M] Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey. [Csöszi T] County Oncology Centre, Hetényi Géza Hospital, Szolnok, Hungary
dc.identifier.pmid39475359
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record