Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorSoto Alsar, Javier
dc.contributor.authorPáez, David
dc.contributor.authorAna, Fernández Montes
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Alfonso, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorElez, Elena
dc.contributor.authorGraña, Begoña
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T09:31:35Z
dc.date.available2025-01-15T09:31:35Z
dc.date.issued2024-12
dc.identifier.citationGarcía-Alfonso P, Elez E, Soto-Alsar J, Páez D, Fernández-Montes A, Graña B, et al. Maintenance with 5-FU/LV-aflibercept after induction with FOLFIRI-aflibercept versus FOLFIRI-aflibercept until progression as second-line treatment in older adults with metastatic colorectal cancer: the AFEMA phase II randomized trial. ESMO Open. 2024 Dec;9(12):103986.
dc.identifier.issn2059-7029
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/12417
dc.descriptionMaintenance treatment; Metastatic colorectal cancer
dc.description.abstractBackground The combination chemotherapy i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan, and aflibercept (FOLFIRI-A) is a standard second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The aim was to assess maintenance treatment in second-line setting in older patients (aged ≥70 years) with mCRC. Patients and methods We evaluated FOLFIRI-A given for six cycles followed by maintenance with 5-FU/leucovorin (LV)-A (arm A) or FOLFIRI-A (arm B) until progression in older adults with mCRC in the AFEMA randomized, open-label, non-inferiority phase II trial (EudraCT2016-004076-21/NCT03279289). Patients aged ≥70 years who previously failed oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine were randomly allocated (1 : 1) to either arm A (experimental) or arm B (control). After enrolling 35 patients, the FOLFIRI dose was reduced to level 1 in both arms due to toxicity. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (PFS); and secondary endpoints were median overall survival, objective response rate, and safety. Non-inferiority required the upper confidence interval (CI) limit to not exceed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.5 (one-sided α = 0.075, 80% power). Results A total of 170 patients were randomly allocated to arm A or arm B (n = 85 each). The median follow-up was 12.2 versus 10.9 months in arm A versus arm B. Most patients died (83.5% versus 88.2% in arm A versus arm B), mainly from disease progression. PFS non-inferiority was met (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.566-1.076, P = 0.131) with a median PFS of 6.1 versus 5.5 months in arm A versus arm B. Median overall survival was similar in arms A and B (12.2 and 11.5 months, respectively) (HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.640-1.227, P = 0.467). During the maintenance phase, severe asthenia (4.5% versus 21.6%, P = 0.038), serious adverse events (SAEs) (17.8% versus 37.8%, P = 0.049), and treatment-related SAEs (6.7% versus 10.8%, P = 0.695) were reduced in arm A versus arm B. Conclusion In older adults, induction with six cycles of FOLFIRI-A plus maintenance with 5-FU/LV-A was non-inferior to FOLFIRI-A until progression. Severe asthenia, SAEs, and treatment-related SAEs were reduced with 5-FU/LV-A maintenance.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesESMO Open;9(12)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectRecte - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectCòlon - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectQuimioteràpia combinada
dc.subject.meshColorectal Neoplasms
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subject.meshDisease Progression
dc.titleMaintenance with 5-FU/LV-aflibercept after induction with FOLFIRI-aflibercept versus FOLFIRI-aflibercept until progression as second-line treatment in older adults with metastatic colorectal cancer: the AFEMA phase II randomized trial
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103986
dc.subject.decsneoplasias colorrectales
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsprotocolos de quimioterapia antineoplásica combinada
dc.subject.decsprogresión de la enfermedad
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103986
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[García-Alfonso P, Soto-Alsar J] Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain. [Elez E] Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain. [Páez D] Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, U705 CIBERER, Barcelona, Spain. [Fernández-Montes A] Department of Medical Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain. [Graña B] Department of Medical Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, Instituto Investigación Biomédica INIBIC, A Coruña, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid39608305
dc.identifier.wos001369641900001
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record