Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorThunold, Solfrid
dc.contributor.authorHernes, Eivor
dc.contributor.authorFarooqi, Saima
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, Roslyn
dc.contributor.authorSimo Perdigo, Marc
dc.contributor.authorÖjlert, Åsa Kristina
dc.contributor.authorNowak, Anna
dc.contributor.authorcedres, susana
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-04T08:51:19Z
dc.date.available2025-03-04T08:51:19Z
dc.date.copyright2024
dc.date.issued2025-01
dc.identifier.citationThunold S, Hernes E, Farooqi S, Öjlert ÅK, Francis RJ, Nowak AK, et al. Outcome prediction based on [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with pleural mesothelioma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab +/- UV1 telomerase vaccine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Jan;52:693–707.
dc.identifier.issn1619-7089
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/12682
dc.descriptionImmunotherapy; Pleural mesothelioma; Telomerase vaccine
dc.description.abstractPurpose The introduction of immunotherapy in pleural mesothelioma (PM) has highlighted the need for effective outcome predictors. This study explores the role of [18F]FDG PET/CT in predicting outcomes in PM treated with immunotherapy. Methods Patients from the NIPU trial, receiving ipilimumab and nivolumab +/- telomerase vaccine in second-line, were included. [18F]FDG PET/CT was obtained at baseline (n = 100) and at week-5 (n = 76). Metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and peak standardised uptake value (SUVpeak) were evaluated in relation to survival outcomes. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to assess differences in MTV, total lesion glycolysis (TLG), maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) and SUVpeak between patients exhibiting an objective response, defined as either partial response or complete response according to the modified Response Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) and immune RECIST (iRECIST), and non-responders, defined as either stable disease or progressive disease as their best overall response. Results Univariate Cox regression revealed significant associations of MTV with OS (HR 1.36, CI: 1.14, 1.62, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 1.18, CI: 1.03, 1.34, p = 0.02), while multivariate analysis showed a significant association with OS only (HR 1.35, CI: 1.09, 1.68, p = 0.007). While SUVpeak was not significantly associated with OS or PFS in univariate analyses, it was significantly associated with OS in multivariate analysis (HR 0.43, CI: 0.23, 0.80, p = 0.008). Objective responders had significant reductions in TLG, SUVmax and SUVpeak at week-5. Conclusion MTV provides prognostic value in PM treated with immunotherapy. High SUVpeak was not associated with inferior outcomes, which could be attributed to the distinct mechanisms of immunotherapy. Early reductions in PET metrics correlated with treatment response. Study registration The NIPU trial (NCT04300244) is registered at clinicaltrials.gov. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04300244?cond=Pleural+Mesothelioma&cntry=NO&draw=2&rank=4
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging;52
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectAvaluació de resultats (Assistència sanitària)
dc.subjectMesotelioma - Immunoteràpia
dc.subjectPleura - Càncer - Immunoteràpia
dc.subjectTomografia per emissió de positrons
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.subject.meshPleural Neoplasms
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshMesothelioma
dc.subject.meshCombined Modality Therapy
dc.subject.meshPositron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
dc.titleOutcome prediction based on [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with pleural mesothelioma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab +/- UV1 telomerase vaccine
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00259-024-06853-0
dc.subject.decsresultado del tratamiento
dc.subject.decsneoplasias pleurales
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsmesotelioma
dc.subject.decstratamiento combinado
dc.subject.decstomografía por emisión de positrones-tomografía computarizada
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-06853-0
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Thunold S, Farooqi S, Öjlert ÅK] Dept of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Dept of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. [Hernes E] Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. [Francis RJ] Dept of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia. Medical School of The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. [Nowak AK] Medical School of The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. National Centre for Asbestos-Related Diseases, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia. [Cedres S] Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Simo Perdigo M] Servei de Medicina Nuclear, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid39133306
dc.identifier.wos001289939500002
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record