Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorKuchimanchi, Mita
dc.contributor.authorJørgensen, Trine Lembrecht
dc.contributor.authorHanze, Eva
dc.contributor.authorJain, Angela
dc.contributor.authorBerton, Dominique
dc.contributor.authorAndré, Thierry
dc.contributor.authorOAKNIN, ANA
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-10T12:41:45Z
dc.date.available2025-03-10T12:41:45Z
dc.date.copyright2024
dc.date.issued2025-03
dc.identifier.citationKuchimanchi M, Jørgensen TL, Hanze E, André T, Jain A, Berton D, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and exposure–response relationships of dostarlimab in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in part 1 of RUBY. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Mar;91(3):841–55.
dc.identifier.issn1365-2125
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11351/12733
dc.descriptionClinical pharmacology; Oncology; Pharmacokinetics
dc.description.abstractAims Dostarlimab-gxly is a humanized monoclonal antibody of the IgG4 isotype that binds to the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) receptor and blocks its ligands. RUBY (NCT03981796) is a two-part multicentre study in patients with recurrent or primary advanced endometrial cancer. The overall aims were to characterise the population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) from Part 1 of this study, identify relevant covariates of interest, and assess exposure–efficacy/safety (ER) relationships. Methods A PopPK model developed using GARNET (NCT02715284) study data for dostarlimab monotherapy was externally validated with RUBY Part 1 study data. Subsequently, the model was updated with data across the two studies. Exposure–safety analyses for adverse events related to dostarlimab alone or in combination with standard of care (SOC) were modelled using logistic regression. Exposure–efficacy analysis included Cox proportional hazards analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS). Results For the model update, 7957 pharmacokinetics observations from 868 patients pooled from both RUBY and GARNET studies were available. The model was consistent with the previous model. Dostarlimab clearance was estimated to be 7.79% lower when dostarlimab was given as SOC combination therapy. However, no significant covariates were clinically relevant. Hepatic or renal impairment did not affect pharmacokinetics. Among the safety endpoints, only rash showed a small yet statistically significant effect (P < .05) in all subjects; however, this was not not deemed clinically relevant. There were no other clinically significant exposure–safety or exposure–PFS relationships. Conclusions The addition of chemotherapy to dostarlimab had limited effect on dostarlimab PopPK, with no clinically significant covariates or clinically relevant exposure–safety or exposure–PFS relationships.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology;91(3)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectAnticossos monoclonals - Farmacocinètica
dc.subjectAnticossos monoclonals - Ús terapèutic
dc.subjectEndometri - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subject.meshEndometrial Neoplasms
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
dc.subject.mesh/pharmacokinetics
dc.subject.meshDose-Response Relationship, Drug
dc.titlePopulation pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationships of dostarlimab in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in part 1 of RUBY
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bcp.16325
dc.subject.decsneoplasias endometriales
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsanticuerpos monoclonales humanizados
dc.subject.decs/farmacocinética
dc.subject.decsrelación dosis-respuesta de medicamentos
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16325
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Kuchimanchi M] GSK, Waltham, MA, USA. [Jørgensen TL] Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. [Hanze E] qPharmetra, Uppsala, Sweden. [André T] Saint-Antoine Hospital, INSERM, Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938, and SIRIC CURAMUS, Sorbonne University, Paris, France. [Jain A] Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. [Berton D] GINECO & Institut de Cancerologie de l’Ouest, Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France. [Oaknin A] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid39520048
dc.identifier.wos001355342300001
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record