Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorSanchez Mauriño, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorSerrano Domingo, Juan Jose
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Galindo , Regina
dc.contributor.authorSequero-Lopez, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorGutierrez Sanz, Lourdes
dc.contributor.authorSORIA RIVAS, AINARA
dc.contributor.authorMUÑOZ COUSELO, EVA
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-17T06:59:56Z
dc.date.available2025-04-17T06:59:56Z
dc.date.issued2025-02-26
dc.identifier.citationSoria A, Sanchez Mauriño P, Serrano Domingo JJ, García Galindo R, Sequero S, Gutiérrez Sanz L, et al. Real-life evidence of encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma in Spain: the BECARE (GEM-2002) trial. Front Oncol. 2025 Feb 26;15:1466185.
dc.identifier.issn2234-943X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11351/12964
dc.descriptionImmune checkpoint inhibitors; Melanoma; Mutation
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Combined BRAF/MEK inhibition with encorafenib (E) plus binimetinib (B) has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in phase III clinical trials, and is the standard of care for advanced/metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma. However, real-life evidence is limited, particularly in patients pre-treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Patients and methods: BECARE GEM 2002 was a retrospective, non-interventional study aimed at investigating the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of EB in patients with unresectable or metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma conducted at 21 sites in Spain. The primary objective of this study was to characterise the population of patients receiving EB and assess the efficacy and tolerability of EB in real life. The study included patients treated according to standard clinical practice with EB as the 1st line or 2nd line after progression to ICI for an unresectable or metastatic stage. Patients who previously received treatment with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitor, other than as adjuvants, that ended ≥ 6 m before EB were not eligible Results: From September 2021 to March 2023, 117 patients were included; 89 (76.1%) and 28 (23.9%) patients received EB as 1st line and 2nd line, respectively. The median follow-up was 13.8 months (95% CI: 12.0-17.4). In patients with EB as 1st line treatment, ORR and median PFS were 75% and 12 months (95% CI: 9.4-18.6), respectively. In patients with EB as 2nd line treatment after ICI, ORR and median PFS were 77.8% and 12.5 months (95% CI: 6.6-NA), respectively. In patients with brain metastasis ORR and median PFS were 70.8% and 6.3 months (95% CI: 6.1-10.3). Treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥3 were reported in 17 (14.5%) patients; transaminitis (9.4%) and diarrhoea (2.6%) were the most frequent adverse events. Conclusion: In this real-world study, EB treatment demonstrated effectiveness and a consistent safety profile in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma treated according to standard clinical practice, including in those with prior ICI treatment and of brain metastasis; therefore, EB is a feasible treatment option for unresectable and metastatic melanoma. Clinical trial identification: REec: 0004-2021-OBS
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFrontiers in Oncology;15
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectAvaluació de resultats (Assistència sanitària)
dc.subjectQuimioteràpia combinada
dc.subjectProteïnes quinases - Inhibidors - Ús terapèutic
dc.subjectMelanoma - Tractament
dc.subjectPell - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectAnomalies cromosòmiques
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subject.meshMutation
dc.subject.meshMelanoma
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshSkin Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshProtein Kinase Inhibitors
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.titleReal-life evidence of encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma in Spain: the BECARE (GEM-2002) trial
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fonc.2025.1466185
dc.subject.decsprotocolos de quimioterapia antineoplásica combinada
dc.subject.decsmutación
dc.subject.decsmelanoma
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsneoplasias cutáneas
dc.subject.decsinhibidores de proteínas cinasas
dc.subject.decsresultado del tratamiento
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1466185
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Soria A, Serrano Domingo JJ] Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. [Sanchez Mauriño P] Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, Córdoba, Spain. [García Galindo R] Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain. [Sequero S] Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain. [Gutiérrez Sanz L] Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain. [Muñoz-Couselo E] Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid40078188
dc.identifier.wos001441845600001
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record