Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorMuhl, Lars
dc.contributor.authorHellberg, Louise
dc.contributor.authorArtursson, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorFriedrich, Jakob
dc.contributor.authorLindberg, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorMezheyeuski, Artur
dc.contributor.authorYu, Hui
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-16T06:16:26Z
dc.date.available2025-05-16T06:16:26Z
dc.date.issued2025-05
dc.identifier.citationLindberg A, Muhl L, Yu H, Hellberg L, Artursson R, Friedrich J, et al. In situ detection of PD1–PD-L1 interactions as a functional predictor for response to immune checkpoint inhibition in NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2025 May;20(5):625-40.
dc.identifier.issn1556-0864
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11351/13093
dc.descriptionImmune checkpoint inhibitor; Programmed cell death protein 1; Non-small cell lung cancer
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed lung cancer treatment, yet their effectiveness seem restricted to certain patient subsets. Current clinical stratification on the basis of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression offers limited predictive value. Given the mechanism of action, directly detecting spatial programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1)–PD-L1 interactions might yield more precise insights into immune responses and treatment outcomes. Methods We applied a second-generation in situ proximity ligation assay to detect PD1–PD-L1 interactions in diagnostic tissue samples from 16 different cancer types, a tissue microarray with surgically resected early-stage NSCLC, and finally diagnostic biopsies from 140 patients with advanced NSCLC with and without ICI treatment. RNA sequencing analysis was used to identify potential resistance mechanisms. Results In the early-stage NSCLC, only approximately half of the cases with detectable PD-L1 and PD1 expression exhibited PD1–PD-L1 interactions, with significantly lower levels in EGFR-mutated tumors. Interaction levels varied across cancer types, aligning with reported ICI response rates. In ICI-treated patients with NSCLC, higher PD1–PD-L1 interactions were linked to complete responses and longer survival, outperforming standard PD-L1 expression assays. Patients who did not respond to ICIs despite high PD1–PD-L1 interactions exhibited additional expression of stromal immune mediators (EOMES, HAVCR1/TIM-1, JAML, FCRL1). Conclusion Our study proposes a diagnostic shift from static biomarker quantification to assessing active immune pathways, providing more precise ICI treatment. This functional concept applies to tiny lung biopsies and can be extended to further immune checkpoints. Accordingly, our results indicate concerted ICI resistance mechanisms, highlighting the need for combination diagnostics and therapies.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Thoracic Oncology;20(5)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectMedicaments antineoplàstics - Ús terapèutic
dc.subjectPulmons - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectMarcadors bioquímics
dc.subject.meshCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptor
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Agents
dc.subject.mesh/therapeutic use
dc.titleIn Situ Detection of Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 and Programmed Death Ligand 1 Interactions as a Functional Predictor for Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in NSCLC
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtho.2024.12.026
dc.subject.decscarcinoma de pulmón de células no pequeñas
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsreceptor 1 de la muerte celular programada
dc.subject.decsantineoplásicos
dc.subject.decs/uso terapéutico
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2024.12.026
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Lindberg A, Yu H, Hellberg L, Artursson R, Friedrich J] Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. [Muhl L] Department of Medicine (Huddinge), Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden. Centre of Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. [Mezheyeuski A] Molecular Oncology Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid39743139
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record