Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorIanus, Andrada
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Brian
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Rachel Laura Coopersmith
dc.contributor.authorSchilling, Kurt
dc.contributor.authorGrussu, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorHoward, Amy
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-26T12:45:08Z
dc.date.available2025-05-26T12:45:08Z
dc.date.issued2025-06
dc.identifier.citationSchilling KG, Grussu F, Ianus A, Hansen B, Howard AFD, Barrett RLC, et al. Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM diffusion study group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 2—Ex vivo imaging: Added value and acquisition. Magn Reson Med. 2025 Jun;93(6):2535-60.
dc.identifier.issn1522-2594
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11351/13141
dc.descriptionDiffusion MRI; Diffusion tensor; Ex vivo
dc.description.abstractThe value of preclinical diffusion MRI (dMRI) is substantial. While dMRI enables in vivo non-invasive characterization of tissue, ex vivo dMRI is increasingly being used to probe tissue microstructure and brain connectivity. Ex vivo dMRI has several experimental advantages including higher SNR and spatial resolution compared to in vivo studies, and enabling more advanced diffusion contrasts for improved microstructure and connectivity characterization. Another major advantage of ex vivo dMRI is the direct comparison with histological data, as a crucial methodological validation. However, there are a number of considerations that must be made when performing ex vivo experiments. The steps from tissue preparation, image acquisition and processing, and interpretation of results are complex, with many decisions that not only differ dramatically from in vivo imaging of small animals, but ultimately affect what questions can be answered using the data. This work represents “Part 2” of a three-part series of recommendations and considerations for preclinical dMRI. We describe best practices for dMRI of ex vivo tissue, with a focus on the value that ex vivo imaging adds to the field of dMRI and considerations in ex vivo image acquisition. We first give general considerations and foundational knowledge that must be considered when designing experiments. We briefly describe differences in specimens and models and discuss why some may be more or less appropriate for different studies. We then give guidelines for ex vivo protocols, including tissue fixation, sample preparation, and MR scanning. In each section, we attempt to provide guidelines and recommendations, but also highlight areas for which no guidelines exist (and why), and where future work should lie. An overarching goal herein is to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of ex vivo dMRI acquisitions and analyses, and thereby advance biomedical knowledge.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMagnetic Resonance in Medicine;93(6)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectImatges - Processament
dc.subjectImatgeria per ressonància magnètica
dc.subjectAnimals de laboratori
dc.subjectCervell - Imatgeria
dc.subject.meshImage Processing, Computer-Assisted
dc.subject.meshDiffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subject.meshAnimals
dc.subject.meshBrain
dc.subject.mesh/diagnostic imaging
dc.titleConsiderations and recommendations from the ISMRM diffusion study group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 2—Ex vivo imaging: Added value and acquisition
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mrm.30435
dc.subject.decsprocesamiento de imágenes asistido por ordenador
dc.subject.decsimagen de resonancia magnética de difusión
dc.subject.decsanimales
dc.subject.decsencéfalo
dc.subject.decs/diagnóstico por imagen
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30435
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Schilling KG] Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee USA. Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee USA. [Grussu F] Radiomics Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Queen Square MS Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK. [Ianus A] Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal. School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London. [Hansen B] Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. [Howard AFD] Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK. FMRIB Centre, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. [Barrett RLC] Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK. NatBrainLab, Department of Forensics and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
dc.identifier.pmid40035293
dc.identifier.wos001437069700001
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record