Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorAlessiani, Michele
dc.contributor.authorBonura, Adriano
dc.contributor.authorIaccarino, Gianmarco
dc.contributor.authorRossi, Sergio Soeren
dc.contributor.authorMANGIARDI, MARILENA
dc.contributor.authorBravi, Maria Cristina
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-20T08:56:39Z
dc.date.available2025-10-20T08:56:39Z
dc.date.issued2025-06
dc.identifier.citationAlessiani M, Bonura A, Iaccarino G, Rossi SS, Mangiardi M, Bravi MC, et al. Safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy in distal medium vessel occlusions: Experience and real-world data from an Italian stroke hub centre. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2025 Jun;34(6):108321.
dc.identifier.issn1052-3057
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11351/13887
dc.descriptionDistal medium vessel occlusion; Ischemic stroke; Mechanical thrombectomy
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose: Distal-medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) contribute to approximately 25-40 % of cases of ischemic stroke. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) achieved a complete recanalization in <50 % of cases. Observational studies have demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in DMVOs compared to LVOs. Recently published RCTs have shown that MT plus best medical therapy in DMVOs does not improve the outcome compared to best medical therapy alone METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study involving patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and primary or secondary DMVO according to literature classification. DMVOs were defined as occlusion in the A2, A3, distal M2 or its single branch, M3, P2, P3, PICA, SCA and AICA. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MT alone in DMVOs compared to IVT. Efficacy was assessed by considering the change in NIHSS from admission to discharge, 3 months Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), 3 months mortality rate and recanalization rate. Safety was assessed based on haemorrhagic transformation and procedural complications. As a secondary endpoint we compared primary and secondary DMVO to highlight any differences. Results: In primary plus secondary DMVO after propensity score analysis there were no statistically significant differences in efficacy and safety between MT and IVT though a positive trend for NIHSS reduction in the MT group. Sub-analysis of primary DMVO did not show significant differences between the two groups. MT group achieved an excellent recanalization rate with mTICI ≥2b in 95 % of cases and no procedural complications occurred. Conclusions: MT in DMVOs showed an excellent recanalization rate and few procedural complications. New RCTs are needed to compare the efficacy and safety of MT alone versus IVT alone in primary and secondary DMVOs separately.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases;34(6)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectAvaluació de resultats (Assistència sanitària)
dc.subjectMalalties cerebrovasculars - Tractament
dc.subjectTeràpia trombolítica
dc.subjectVasos sanguinis - Cirurgia
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.subject.meshThrombectomy
dc.subject.meshThrombolytic Therapy
dc.subject.meshStroke
dc.subject.mesh/therapy
dc.titleSafety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy in distal medium vessel occlusions: Experience and real-world data from an Italian stroke hub centre
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108321
dc.subject.decsresultado del tratamiento
dc.subject.decstrombectomía
dc.subject.decstratamiento trombolítico
dc.subject.decsaccidente cerebrovascular
dc.subject.decs/terapia
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108321
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Alessiani M] Department of Neurology, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy. [Bonura A] Unitat d’Ictus, Servei de Neurologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Iaccarino G] BarcelonaBeta Brain Research Center and Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain. [Rossi SS] Deparment of Neurology, IRCSS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy. [Mangiardi M, Bravi MC] Head, Neck and Neuroscience Department, Stroke Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
dc.identifier.pmid40239825
dc.identifier.wos001477036400001
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record