Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jay M.
dc.contributor.authorBrunelli, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorCummings, Amy L
dc.contributor.authorShu, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorFELIP, ENRIQUETA
dc.contributor.authorSolomon, Benjamin
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-20T12:25:31Z
dc.date.available2025-10-20T12:25:31Z
dc.date.issued2025-09
dc.identifier.citationLee JM, Brunelli A, Cummings AL, Felip E, Shu CA, Solomon BJ, et al. Phase 3 Trials of Neoadjuvant, Perioperative, and Adjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for Resectable, Early-Stage NSCLC: Comprehensive Review and Detailed Analysis. JTO Clin Res Reports. 2025 Sep;6(9):100866.
dc.identifier.issn2666-3643
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11351/13892
dc.descriptionEarly-stage lung cancer; Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy; PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitor therapy
dc.description.abstractPhase 3 trials of neoadjuvant, perioperative, and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy (ICI-CT) in resectable early-stage NSCLC (eNSCLC) have reported that all three approaches confer an event-free or disease-free survival benefit over CT alone, with acceptable safety profiles. All three strategies are approved standards of care for eNSCLC. This review provides a detailed analysis of these phase 3 ICI-CT trials and addresses the considerations regarding the selection of each approach, including protocol schema and baseline patient and tumor differences, preoperative staging, surgical outcomes, efficacy end points, safety, treatment disposition, and the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) efficacy biomarker. The differences between regimens and study populations among these ICI-CT trials hamper cross-trial comparisons and highlight the need for head-to-head trials. Patients achieving pathologic complete response with neoadjuvant ICI-CT have better survival outcomes irrespective of subsequent treatment, but the optimal number of preoperative ICI-CT cycles needed to achieve pathologic complete response has not been defined. The choice between a neoadjuvant or perioperative versus adjuvant treatment approach involves a risk-benefit assessment of the potential for preoperative attrition to surgery, postoperative attrition to ICI-CT, and the anticipated toxicity profile. Current limitations of invasive lymph node staging mean that adjuvant ICI remains an important treatment strategy, but preoperative node staging is imperative. Future studies that identify the safety and toxicity contributions of each treatment phase in perioperative trials will confirm whether a pre- or postoperative ICI approach is superior, whether there is added benefit to adjuvant after neoadjuvant ICI-CT, and which patients will benefit the most from each approach.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJTO Clinical and Research Reports;6(9)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectAvaluació de resultats (Assistència sanitària)
dc.subjectQuimioteràpia combinada
dc.subjectPulmons - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectMedicaments antineoplàstics - Ús terapèutic
dc.subjectAnticossos monoclonals - Ús terapèutic
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.subject.meshCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Agents, Immunological
dc.subject.mesh/therapeutic use
dc.titlePhase 3 Trials of Neoadjuvant, Perioperative, and Adjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for Resectable, Early-Stage NSCLC: Comprehensive Review and Detailed Analysis
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100866
dc.subject.decsresultado del tratamiento
dc.subject.decscarcinoma de pulmón de células no pequeñas
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsprotocolos de quimioterapia antineoplásica combinada
dc.subject.decsinmunoterapia antineoplásica
dc.subject.decs/uso terapéutico
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100866
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Lee JM, Cummings AL] Division of Thoracic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California. [Brunelli A] Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom. [Felip E] Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Shu CA] Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York. [Solomon BJ] Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
dc.identifier.pmid40785843
dc.identifier.wos001543179100002
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record