Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authormeazza, cristina
dc.contributor.authortamburini, angela
dc.contributor.authorMárquez, Catalina
dc.contributor.authorFAGIOLI, FRANCA
dc.contributor.authorPalmerini, Emanuela
dc.contributor.authorBisogno, Gianni
dc.contributor.authorValverde, Claudia María
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-22T08:30:55Z
dc.date.available2025-10-22T08:30:55Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-01
dc.identifier.citationPalmerini E, Meazza C, Tamburini A, Márquez-Vega C, Bisogno G, Fagioli F, et al. Is There a Role for Mifamurtide in Nonmetastatic High-Grade Osteosarcoma? Results From the Italian Sarcoma Group (ISG/OS-2) and Spanish Sarcoma Group (GEIS-33) Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Oct 1;43(28):3113–22.
dc.identifier.issn1527-7755
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11351/13904
dc.descriptionMifamurtide; Osteosarcoma
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Outcome of patients with localized osteosarcoma is challenging. The role of mifamurtide is still a matter of debate. Two prospective trials were carried out in Italy (ISG/OS-2) and Spain (GEIS-33) with mifamurtide in ABCB1/P-glycoprotein (Pgp)-positive patients. Patients and methods: Patients age ≤40 years with localized extremity high-grade osteosarcoma were eligible. Analysis of Pgp expression from diagnostic biopsy was centralized. Patients received two cycles of preoperative methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatinum (MAP) before surgery. Postoperatively, in case of Pgp overexpression (Pgp-positive), mifamurtide was added, combined with doxorubicin (one cycle) and four consecutive cycles of high-dose ifosfamide (HDIFO) for patients with poor histologic response, or with MAP in case of good response. Patients who were Pgp-negative received MAP postoperatively. We present the merged analysis of ISG/OS-2 and GEIS-33 trial, an observational study with same inclusion criteria and treatment of ISG/OS-2. The primary endpoint was 5-year event-free survival (EFS) according to the use of mifamurtide. Secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: From March 2013 to April 2018, 398 patients were analyzed. The median age was 14 years (range, 4-40), male/female: 238/160 (1.48/1.0); 211 of 398 (53%) tumors were Pgp-positive, and 204 of 398 (51.3%) patients received mifamurtide. With a median follow-up of 70 months (IQR, 49-90 months), the 5-year EFS and OS were 65.2% (95% CI, 60.1 to 69.8) and 74.8% (95% CI, 69.8 to 79.0), respectively, with superior EFS for patients undergoing mifamurtide and chemotherapy as compared with EFS of patients undergoing chemotherapy alone (5-year EFS 71.4% v 58.3%; P = .0139) not confirmed at multivariable analysis (P = .0593). Conclusion: In this merged analysis with a risk-adapted strategy for nonmetastatic osteosarcoma, the group with unfavorable prognoses, identified by Pgp expression, performed well when mifamurtide, combined with HDIFO in case of poor response, was administered after surgery. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04383288 NCT01459484.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Clinical Oncology;43(28)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectOssos - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectOsteosarcoma - Tractament
dc.subjectQuimioteràpia combinada
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subject.meshBone Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshOsteosarcoma
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.titleIs There a Role for Mifamurtide in Nonmetastatic High-Grade Osteosarcoma? Results From the Italian Sarcoma Group (ISG/OS-2) and Spanish Sarcoma Group (GEIS-33) Trials
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO-25-00210
dc.subject.decsprotocolos de quimioterapia antineoplásica combinada
dc.subject.decsneoplasias óseas
dc.subject.decsosteosarcoma
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-00210
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Palmerini E] Osteoncology, Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas, and Innovative Therapies Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL. [Meazza C] Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy. [Tamburini A] Department of Pediatric Onco-Hematology, AOU Meyer—IRCCS, Florence, Italy. [Márquez-Vega C] Pediatric Oncology Unit, Hospital Infantil Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain. [Bisogno G] Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. [Fagioli F] S.C. Oncoematologia Pediatrica—Regina Margherita Children’s Hospital, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy. [Valverde C] Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid40825172
dc.identifier.wos001577058400004
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record