Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorNovoa-Testa, Iría
dc.contributor.authorCordido, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Berrocal, Víctor
dc.contributor.authorAraujo Castro, Marta
dc.contributor.authorBiagetti, Betina
dc.contributor.authorMenéndez Torre, Edelmiro
dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Saez, Elena
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-22T12:23:45Z
dc.date.available2025-10-22T12:23:45Z
dc.date.issued2025-07
dc.identifier.citationAraujo-Castro M, Biagetti B, Menéndez E, Novoa-Testa I, Cordido F, Rodríguez Berrocal V, et al. Predictors of therapeutic failure in co-secreting GH and prolactin pituitary adenomas. Endocr Connect. 2025 Jul;14(7):e250103.
dc.identifier.issn2049-3614
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11351/13916
dc.descriptionGrowth hormone; Prolactin co-secreting pituitary adenoma; Surgical remission
dc.description.abstractAim To evaluate which factors are associated with a higher probability of failure to surgical and first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fgSRLs) treatment in patients with growth hormone and prolactin co-secreting pituitary adenomas (GH&PRL-PAs). Methods Acromegaly patients with GH&PRL-PAs included in the ACRO-SPAIN study were enrolled. GH&PRL-PAs were defined as tumors with serum PRL levels above the upper limit of normal and positive immunostaining for GH and PRL, or with PRL levels ≥100 ng/mL when immunostaining data were not available. Results A total of 126 acromegaly patients with GH&PRL-PAs who underwent transsphenoidal pituitary surgery were included, and 42.1% (n = 53) were biochemically cured at the immediate postoperative evaluation. Knosp grade >2 (odds ratio (OR) 3.48, 95% CI 1.28–9.38), higher serum GH (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01–1.08) and IGF-1 (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.05–2.45) levels were associated with a lower probability of surgical cure. Sixty-eight patients received first-line medical therapy as follows: fgSRLs in monotherapy (n = 22), fgSRL plus cabergoline (n = 37), cabergoline in monotherapy (n = 7) and pegvisomant in monotherapy (n = 2). Among the cases treated with fgSRL in monotherapy, 18.2% (n = 4/22) were resistant. We identified as predictors of fgSRL resistance (in monotherapy and combined with cabergoline) a Knosp grade >2 (OR 8.75, P = 0.003), high GH levels at acromegaly diagnosis (OR 1.02, P = 0.031) and higher postoperative GH levels (OR 1.05, P = 0.006), but no predictors of response to fgSRL in monotherapy were identified. Conclusion The clinical predictors of surgical failure and of fgSRL resistance in patients with GH&PRL-PAs are similar to those described in acromegaly without PRL, co-secretion. Significance statement In this article focused on GH&PRL pituitary adenomas, we found that a Knosp grade >2, and higher serum GH and IGF-1 levels were associated with a lower probability of surgical cure in these tumors. Regarding the response to fgSRL in monotherapy, 18% of the patients with GH&PRL pituitary adenomas were classified as resistant. Knosp grade >2 (OR 8.75, P = 0.003), high GH levels at acromegaly diagnosis (OR 1.02, P = 0.031), and higher postoperative GH levels (OR 1.05, P = 0.006) were predictors of non-response to fgSRL (monotherapy or combined with cabergoline), while no predictors of response to fgSRL in monotherapy were identified. Thus, we concluded the clinical predictors of surgical failure and of fgSRL resistance in patients with GH&PRL-PAs are similar to those described in acromegaly without PRL co-secretion.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBioscientifica
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEndocrine Connections;14(7)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectAcromegàlia
dc.subjectHipòfisi - Tumors - Cirurgia
dc.subjectProlactina
dc.subjectSomatotropina
dc.subjectAdenoma
dc.subject.meshPituitary Neoplasms
dc.subject.mesh/surgery
dc.subject.meshGrowth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma
dc.subject.meshProlactin
dc.subject.meshAcromegaly
dc.titlePredictors of therapeutic failure in GH and prolactin co-secreting pituitary adenomas
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1530/EC-25-0103
dc.subject.decsneoplasias hipofisarias
dc.subject.decs/cirugía
dc.subject.decsadenoma hipofisario secretor de hormona del crecimiento
dc.subject.decsprolactina
dc.subject.decsacromegalia
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1530/EC-25-0103
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Araujo-Castro M] Endocrinology & Nutrition Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Ramón y Cajal (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain. [Biagetti B] Servei d’Endocrinologia i Nutrició, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. CIBERER group 747, Barcelona, Spain. [Menéndez E] Endocrinology & Nutrition Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Asturias, Spain. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Asturias, Spain. [Novoa-Testa I, Cordido F] Endocrinology & Nutrition Department, Hospital Universitario A Coruña & Universidad de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain. [Rodríguez Berrocal V] Neurosurgery Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. [Martínez-Sáez E] Servei d’Anatomia Patològica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid40590355
dc.identifier.wos001551285800014
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record