Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorAlijotas-Reig, Jaume
dc.contributor.authorHOXHA, ARIELA
dc.contributor.authorKhamashta , Munther
dc.contributor.authorShoenfeld, Yehuda Yulius
dc.contributor.authorMiro-Mur, Francesc A.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-29T13:40:32Z
dc.date.available2025-10-29T13:40:32Z
dc.date.issued2025-07
dc.identifier.citationAlijotas-Reig J, Miro-Mur F, Hoxha A, Khamashta MA, Shoenfeld Y. 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome: more lights rise but shade remains. RMD Open. 2025 Jul;11(3):e006014.
dc.identifier.issn2056-5933
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11351/13964
dc.descriptionAntiphospholipid antibodies; Antiphospholipid syndrome; Autoimmune diseases
dc.description.abstractAntiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder for which there are no universally accepted diagnostic criteria, although classification criteria do exist, as is the case with most autoimmune diseases. Until 2023, the 2006 Sydney classification criteria were in use. Although originally intended for research purposes, these criteria have often been employed in clinical practice as a substitute for diagnostic guidelines, thereby conflating classification with diagnosis. In July 2023, ACR and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology convened a panel of experts to revise these criteria. The newly published classification criteria are explicitly intended for research use only. They place a strong emphasis on specificity—99%—but this comes at the expense of sensitivity—84%. The updated criteria encompass six clinical domains and two laboratory domains. Notably, the inclusion of new clinical features, such as thrombocytopenia, cardiac valve involvement and microvascular thrombosis, has broadened patient inclusion and, indirectly, aided the diagnostic process. However, a significant proportion of patients with suspected antiphospholipid antibody-related conditions may no longer meet the criteria for APS classification. In real-world settings, this could result in these individuals being denied appropriate management, thereby increasing their risk of subsequent thrombotic or obstetric events, as has already been demonstrated. This manuscript examines the advantages and limitations of the new clinical and laboratory domains, considering their implications not only from a research but also from a clinical perspective, APS.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMJ
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRMD Open;11(3)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectSíndrome antifosfolipídica - Diagnòstic
dc.subject.meshAntiphospholipid Syndrome
dc.subject.mesh/diagnosis
dc.title2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome: more lights rise but shade remains
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006014
dc.subject.decssíndrome antifosfolípido
dc.subject.decs/diagnóstico
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006014
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Alijotas-Reig J] Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. Servei de Medicina Interna, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. [Miro-Mur F] Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. [Hoxha A] Azienda Ospedale Università Padova, Padova, Veneto, Italy. [Khamashta MA] Medical Affairs, GSK, London, UK. [Shoenfeld Y] Reichmann University, Herzelia, Israel and Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel
dc.identifier.pmid40854811
dc.identifier.wos001559458300001
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record