Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorEgri, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez Rojas, Angela
dc.contributor.authorMarcos, Maria Angeles
dc.contributor.authorBernal-Maurandi, Javier
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Cabrera, Diana
dc.contributor.authorSempere González, Abiu
dc.contributor.authorLos-Arcos, Ibai
dc.contributor.authorMoreso, Francesc
dc.contributor.authorTOAPANTA, NÉSTOR
dc.contributor.authorBodro, Marta
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-05T12:54:56Z
dc.date.available2025-11-05T12:54:56Z
dc.date.issued2025-08
dc.identifier.citationSempere A, Egri N, Gonzalez A, Los-Arcos I, Marcos MA, Bernal-Maurandi J, et al. Utility of the ELISpot Test to Predict the Risk of Developing BK Polyomavirus Nephropathy in Kidney Recipients, a Multicenter Study. Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Aug;13(8):796.
dc.identifier.issn2076-393X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11351/14018
dc.descriptionBK polyomavirus nephropathy; Cell-mediated immunity; Kidney transplantation
dc.description.abstractBackground: BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) reactivation is a common complication after kidney transplantation and may result in nephropathy and graft loss. As there is no effective antiviral therapy, management focuses on early detection and reduction of immunosuppression, which increases the risk of rejection. Identifying patients at higher risk remains challenging. Monitoring BKPyV-specific T-cell responses could aid in predicting reactivation. This study evaluated the usefulness of ELISpot to monitor BKPyV-specific cellular immunity before and after kidney transplantation. Methods: A prospective multicenter study was conducted between October 2020 and March 2022. ELISpot assays were performed prior to transplantation and two months afterward. Results: Seventy-two patients were included, with a median age of 56 years; 61% were men, and 24% had undergone previous transplantation. Nine patients developed presumptive BKPyV-nephropathy. No significant differences were found in donor type, induction therapy, or rejection rates between patients with or without nephropathy (p = 0.38). Based on ELISpot results, patients were classified into three groups according to their risk of BKPyV-nephropathy. The high-risk group included those who changed from positive to negative at 2 months post-transplant, representing 40% of presumptive BKPyV-nephropathy cases. Patients who remained negative at 2 months were classified as moderate risk (14.5%), while those with a positive ELISpot at 2 months comprised the low-risk group (0%). In the logistic regression analysis, both the ELISpot risk category [OR 19 (CI 1.7–2.08)] and the use of mTOR inhibitors from the start of transplantation [OR 0.02 (CI 0.01–0.46)] were significantly associated with BKPyV-nephropathy. Conclusions: Monitoring BKPyV-specific T cells with ELISpot before and after kidney transplantation may help stratify patients by risk of reactivation. Loss of BKPyV immunity at two months is associated with nephropathy, while mTOR-based immunosuppression appears protective. This strategy could guide personalized immunosuppression and surveillance.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVaccines;13(8)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectRonyons - Trasplantació - Complicacions
dc.subjectRonyons - Malalties - Diagnòstic
dc.subjectInfeccions per poliomavirus
dc.subject.meshBK Virus
dc.subject.meshKidney Diseases
dc.subject.mesh/diagnosis
dc.subject.meshKidney Transplantation
dc.subject.mesh/adverse effects
dc.subject.meshPolyomavirus Infections
dc.titleUtility of the ELISpot Test to Predict the Risk of Developing BK Polyomavirus Nephropathy in Kidney Recipients, a Multicenter Study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/vaccines13080796
dc.subject.decsvirus BK
dc.subject.decsenfermedades renales
dc.subject.decs/diagnóstico
dc.subject.decstrasplante de riñón
dc.subject.decs/efectos adversos
dc.subject.decsinfecciones por Polyomavirus
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080796
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Sempere A, Ruiz-Cabrera D] Servei de Malalties Infeccioses, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. PROSICS Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Egri N] Servei d’Immunologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Gonzalez A, Bernal-Maurandi J] Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Los-Arcos I] Servei de Malalties Infeccioses, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. CIBERINFEC, ISCIII-CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. [Marcos MA] CIBERINFEC, ISCIII-CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. Microbiology Department, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Moreso F, Toapanta N] Servei de Nefrologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Bodro M] Servei de Malalties Infeccioses, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. PROSICS Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. CIBERINFEC, ISCIII-CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid40872883
dc.identifier.wos001558517800001
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record