Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorNair, Nitya
dc.contributor.authorMarbach, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorScolyer, Richard
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorCotting, Denise
dc.contributor.authorLong, Georgina
dc.contributor.authorMUÑOZ COUSELO, EVA
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-04T13:59:55Z
dc.date.available2025-12-04T13:59:55Z
dc.date.issued2025-11
dc.identifier.citationLong GV, Nair N, Marbach D, Scolyer RA, Wilson S, Cotting D, et al. Neoadjuvant PD-1 and LAG-3-targeting bispecific antibody and other immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in resectable melanoma: the randomized phase 1b/2 Morpheus-Melanoma trial. Nat Med. 2025 Nov;31:3700–3712.
dc.identifier.issn1546-170X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11351/14133
dc.descriptionBispecific antibody; Immune checkpoint inhibitor; Resectable melanoma
dc.description.abstractPatients with stage III melanoma are at high risk of relapse. The NADINA trial evaluating neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab and the SWOG-1801 trial evaluating neoadjuvant pembrolizumab have demonstrated superior clinical outcomes with neoadjuvant versus adjuvant checkpoint inhibition. Morpheus-Melanoma was a phase 1b/2, randomized umbrella trial evaluating tobemstomig (anti-PD-1/anti-LAG-3 bispecific antibody; n = 40), tobemstomig plus tiragolumab (anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody; n = 20) and atezolizumab (PD-L1-targeting monoclonal antibody) plus tiragolumab (n = 20) versus nivolumab (anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) plus ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody; n = 22) in stage III melanoma. The primary endpoint was pathological response by independent pathological review. Additional endpoints included safety and exploratory biomarkers. Here tobemstomig showed a similar pathological response rate (pRR) versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab (80.0% (32/40) versus 77.3% (17/22)); major pathological responses were less frequent with tobemstomig versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment (62.5% (25/40) versus 72.7% (16/22)). Tobemstomig plus tiragolumab and atezolizumab plus tiragolumab showed a lower pRR versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab (60.0% (12/20) and 45.0% (9/20) versus 77.3% (17/22), respectively). Tobemstomig demonstrated improved safety versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with 2.5% (1/40) and 22.7% (5/22) of patients experiencing grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), respectively, and 0% (0/40) and 13.6% (3/22) of patients discontinuing treatment due to TRAEs, respectively. Grade 3 or higher TRAEs were reported by 15% (3/20) of patients in the tobemstomig plus tiragolumab arm and by no patients in the atezolizumab plus tiragolumab arm. Baseline CD8+ and CD3+ tumor-infiltrating T cell density, IFNγ pathway and effector T cell gene expression, tumor mutational burden and pre-surgery circulating tumor DNA correlated with pathological response across treatments. In conclusion, in the Morpheus-Melanoma study, tobemstomig demonstrated a similar pathological response and improved safety profile versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with resectable stage III melanoma. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05116202.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNature Portfolio
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNature Medicine;31
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectMelanoma - Tractament
dc.subjectAnticossos monoclonals - Ús terapèutic
dc.subjectMedicaments antineoplàstics - Ús terapèutic
dc.subjectQuimioteràpia combinada
dc.subject.meshNeoadjuvant Therapy
dc.subject.meshAntibodies, Bispecific
dc.subject.meshAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
dc.subject.meshMelanoma
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.titleNeoadjuvant PD-1 and LAG-3-targeting bispecific antibody and other immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in resectable melanoma: the randomized phase 1b/2 Morpheus-Melanoma trial
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41591-025-03967-2
dc.subject.decstratamiento neoadyuvante
dc.subject.decsanticuerpos biespecíficos
dc.subject.decsanticuerpos monoclonales humanizados
dc.subject.decsmelanoma
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03967-2
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Long GV] Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Royal North Shore Hospital and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. [Nair N, Marbach D] Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland. [Scolyer RA] Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. [Wilson S] Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Welwyn, Roche Products, Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, UK. [Cotting D] F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland. [Munoz-Couselo E] Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid40993242
dc.identifier.wos001577749800001
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record