Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorCare, A.
dc.contributor.authorMuller‐Myhsok, B.
dc.contributor.authorOlearo, E.
dc.contributor.authorTodros, T.
dc.contributor.authorCaradeux, J.
dc.contributor.authorGoya Canino, Maria del Mar
dc.contributor.authorCarreras Moratonas, Elena
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-08T10:59:26Z
dc.date.available2021-04-08T10:59:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-04
dc.identifier.citationCare A, Muller‐Myhsok B, Olearo E, Todros T, Caradeux J, Goya M, et al. Should phenotype of previous preterm birth influence management of women with short cervix in subsequent pregnancy? Comparison of vaginal progesterone and Arabin pessary. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):529–34.
dc.identifier.issn1469-0705
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/5831
dc.descriptionArabin pessary; Short cervix; Vaginal progesterone
dc.description.abstractObjective To investigate whether the classification of a previous spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) as preterm labor (PTL) with intact membranes (IM) or as preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) impacts the efficacy of cervical pessary or vaginal progesterone for prevention of sPTB in pregnant women with short cervix on transvaginal ultrasound. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of asymptomatic high‐risk singleton pregnancies with a short cervix and history of sPTB, treated using Arabin pessary or vaginal progesterone for primary PTB prevention, conducted at four European hospitals. A log‐rank test on Kaplan–Meier curves was used to assess the difference in performance of pessary and progesterone, according to history of PTL‐IM or PPROM. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate significant predictors of gestational age at delivery. Results Between 2008 and 2015, 170 women were treated with a pessary and 88 with vaginal progesterone. In women treated with a pessary, rate of sPTB < 34 weeks was 16% in those with a history of PTL‐IM and 55% in those with a history of PPROM. In women treated with progesterone, rate of sPTB < 34 weeks was 13% in those with a history of PTL‐IM and 21% in those with a history of PPROM. Treatment with a pessary resulted in earlier delivery in women with previous PPROM than in any other subgroup (P < 0.0001). Linear regression analysis showed a clear effect of PPROM history (P < 0.0001), combination of PPROM history and treatment (P = 0.0003) and cervical length (P = 0.0004) on gestational age at birth. Conclusions Cervical pessary may be a less efficacious treatment option for women with previous PPROM; however, these results require prospective validation before change in practice is recommended. Phenotype of previous preterm birth may be an important risk predictor and treatment effect modifier; this information should be reported in future clinical trials.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology;53(4)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectMembranes fetals
dc.subjectPart prematur
dc.subjectColl uterí
dc.subject.meshFetal Membranes, Premature Rupture
dc.subject.mesh/prevention & control
dc.subject.meshCervical Length Measurement
dc.subject.meshPremature Birth
dc.titleShould phenotype of previous preterm birth influence management of women with short cervix in subsequent pregnancy? Comparison of vaginal progesterone and Arabin pessary
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/uog.19118
dc.subject.decsrotura prematura de las membranas fetales
dc.subject.decs/prevención & control
dc.subject.decsmedida de la longitud del cuello uterino
dc.subject.decsparto prematuro
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/uog.19118
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Care A] Harris Wellbeing Preterm Birth Centre, Department of Women and Children's Health Research, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK. [Muller-Myhsok B] Waterhouse Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. Max Plank Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany. [Olearo E, Todros T] Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit 2, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. [Caradeux J] Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Goya M, Carreras E] Servei d'Obstetrícia, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid29920812
dc.identifier.wos000463145000015
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record