Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorDepartament de Salut
dc.contributor.authorJunqué, Anna
dc.contributor.authorTomás Bernabeu, Ester
dc.contributor.authorAndreu Périz, Lola
dc.contributor.authorSegura-Ortí, Eva
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-28T08:19:49Z
dc.date.available2022-01-28T08:19:49Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-19
dc.identifier.citationJunqué Jiménez A, Tomás Bernabeu E, Andreu Périz L, Segura Ortí E. Impact of measurement timing on reproducibility of testing among haemodialysis patients. Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 19;12(1):1004.
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11351/6931
dc.descriptionHemodialysis; Exercise; Functional activity test
dc.description.abstractAccurate evaluation of physical function in patients undergoing haemodialysis is crucial in the analysis of the impact of exercise programs in this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of several physical functional tests, depending on the timing of their implementation (before the HD session vs. non-HD days). This is a prospective, non-experimental, descriptive study. Thirty patients in haemodialysis were evaluated twice, 1 week apart. The test session was performed before the haemodialysis session started and a retest was performed in non-dialysis day. The testing battery included the short physical performance battery, sit-to-stand tests, 6 min walk test, one-leg stand test, timed up and go, and handgrip strength with and without forearm support. The intra-rater reproducibility was determined by the intraclass correlation coefficients and the agreement was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. The intraclass correlation coefficients values ranged from 0.86 to 0.96, so that all tests showed good to very good relative reliability. The mean differences between trials of sit to stand 10 and 60, timed up and go and all the handgrip tests were close to zero, indicating no systematic differences between trials. Large range of values between trials was observed for the 6 min walk test, gait speed, one-leg stand test and short physical performance battery, indicating a systematic bias for these four tests. In conclusion, the sit to stand 10 and 60, timed up and go and handgrip tests had good to excellent test-retest reliability in measuring physical function in different dialysis days of patients undertaking haemodialysis. The minimal detectable change values are provided for this population. Bias were found for the 6 min walk test, gait speed, Short physical performance battery or one-leg stand test when the testing day changed.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNature Publising Group
dc.relation.ispartofseriesScientific Reports;12(1)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectNefropaties
dc.subjectNefrologia
dc.subjectExercici
dc.subjectHemodiàlisis
dc.subject.meshRenal Dialysis
dc.subject.meshKidney Diseases
dc.subject.meshExercise
dc.subject.meshNephrology
dc.titleImpact of measurement timing on reproducibility of testing among haemodialysis patients
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-021-02526-2
dc.subject.decsejercicio físico
dc.subject.decsenfermedades renales
dc.subject.decsdiálisis renal
dc.subject.decsnefrología
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02526-2
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Junqué Jiménez A, Tomás Bernabeu E] Nephrology Department, Hospital de Terrassa, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain. [Andreu Périz L] Nursing Department, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain. [Segura Ortí E] Physiotherapy Department, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid35046421
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record