Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorde Wit, R.
dc.contributor.authorWülfing, C.
dc.contributor.authorCastellano, D.
dc.contributor.authorKramer, G.
dc.contributor.authorEymard, J.-C.
dc.contributor.authorSternberg, C. N.
dc.contributor.authorCarles Galceran, Joan
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-22T13:04:58Z
dc.date.available2022-04-22T13:04:58Z
dc.date.issued2021-10
dc.identifier.citationde Wit R, Wülfing C, Castellano D, Kramer G, Eymard JC, Sternberg CN, et al. Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in the CARD study. ESMO open. 2021 Oct;6(5):100241.
dc.identifier.issn2059-7029
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/7374
dc.descriptionAbiraterone; Cabazitaxel; Prognostic factor
dc.description.abstractBackground There is growing evidence that a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with poor overall survival (OS) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In the CARD study (NCT02485691), cabazitaxel significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and OS versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel and the alternative androgen-receptor-targeted agent (ARTA). Here, we investigated NLR as a biomarker. Patients and methods CARD was a multicenter, open-label study that randomized patients with mCRPC to receive cabazitaxel (25 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) versus abiraterone (1000 mg/day) or enzalutamide (160 mg/day). The relationships between baseline NLR [< versus ≥ median (3.38)] and rPFS, OS, time to prostate-specific antigen progression, and prostate-specific antigen response to cabazitaxel versus ARTA were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier estimates. Multivariable Cox regression with stepwise selection of covariates was used to investigate the prognostic association between baseline NLR and OS. Results The rPFS benefit with cabazitaxel versus ARTA was particularly marked in patients with high NLR {8.5 versus 2.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.67]; P < 0.0001}, compared with low NLR [7.5 versus 5.1 months, respectively; HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.45-1.06); P = 0.0860]. Higher NLR (continuous covariate, per 1 unit increase) independently associated with poor OS [HR 1.05 (95% CI 1.02-1.08); P = 0.0003]. For cabazitaxel, there was no OS difference between patients with high versus low NLR (15.3 versus 12.9 months, respectively; P = 0.7465). Patients receiving an ARTA with high NLR, however, had a worse OS versus those with low NLR (9.5 versus 13.3 months, respectively; P = 0.0608). Conclusions High baseline NLR predicts poor outcomes with an ARTA in patients with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel and the alternative ARTA. Conversely, the activity of cabazitaxel is retained irrespective of NLR.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesESMO Open;6(5)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectPròstata - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectPròstata - Càncer - Prognosi
dc.subjectQuimioteràpia combinada
dc.subject.meshProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subject.meshPrognosis
dc.titleBaseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in the CARD study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100241
dc.subject.decsneoplasias prostáticas resistentes a la castración
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsprotocolos de quimioterapia antineoplásica combinada
dc.subject.decspronóstico
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100241
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[de Wit R] Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. [Wülfing C] Department of Urology, Asklepios Tumorzentrum, Hamburg, Germany. [Castellano D] Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. [Kramer G] Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. [Eymard JC] Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Jean Godinot, Reims, France. [Sternberg CN] Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA. [Carles J] Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid34450475
dc.identifier.wos000704803800034
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record