Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorGion, María
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Garcia, Jose Manuel
dc.contributor.authorLlombart-Cussac, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorCortés Castan, Javier
dc.contributor.authorSampayo-Cordero, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorMalfettone, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-09T08:28:31Z
dc.date.available2022-06-09T08:28:31Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.identifier.citationGion M, Pérez-García JM, Llombart-Cussac A, Sampayo-Cordero M, Cortés J, Malfettone A. Surrogate endpoints for early-stage breast cancer: a review of the state of the art, controversies, and future prospects. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Jan 1;13:1–30.
dc.identifier.issn1758-8359
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/7655
dc.descriptionBreast cancer subtypes; Neoadjuvant therapy; Surrogate markers
dc.description.abstractDrug approval for early-stage breast cancer (EBC) has been historically granted in the context of registration trials based on adequate outcomes such as disease-free survival and overall survival. Improvements in long-term outcomes have made it more difficult to demonstrate the clinical benefit of a new cancer drug in large, randomized, comparative clinical trials. Therefore, the use of surrogate endpoints rather than traditional measures allows for cancer drug trials to proceed with smaller sample sizes and shorter follow-up periods, which reduces drug development time. Among surrogate endpoints for breast cancer, the increase in pathological complete response (pCR) rates was considered appropriate for accelerated drug approval. The association between pCR and long-term outcomes was strongest in patients with aggressive tumor subtypes, such as triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive/hormone receptor-negative breast cancers. Whereas in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative EBC, the most accepted surrogate markers for endocrine therapy–based trials include changes in Ki67 and the preoperative endocrine prognostic index. Beyond the classic endpoints, further prognostic tools are required to provide EBC patients with individualized and effective therapies, and the neoadjuvant setting provides an excellent platform for drug development and biomarker discovery. Nowadays, the availability of multigene signatures is offering a standardized quantitative and reproducible tool to potentiate the efficacy of standard treatment for high-risk patients and develop de-escalated treatments for patients at lower risk of relapse. In this article, we first evaluate the surrogacies used for long-term outcomes and the underlying evidence supporting the use of each surrogate endpoint for the accelerated or regular drug approval process in EBC. Next, we provide an overview of the most recent studies and innovative strategies in a (neo)adjuvant setting as a platform to accelerate new drug approval. Finally, we highlight some clinical trials aimed at tailoring systemic treatment of EBC using prognosis-related factors or early biomarkers of drug sensitivity or resistance.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTherapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology;13
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectMama - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectMedicaments - Desenvolupament
dc.subject.meshBreast Neoplasms
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshDrug Approval
dc.titleSurrogate endpoints for early-stage breast cancer: a review of the state of the art, controversies, and future prospects
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/17588359211059587
dc.subject.decsneoplasias de la mama
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsautorización de medicamentos
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1177/17588359211059587
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Gion M] University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. [Pérez-García JM] International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain. Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain. Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Ridgewood, NJ, USA. [Llombart-Cussac A] Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain. Universidad Catolica de Valencia San Vicente Martir, Valencia, Spain. Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain. Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Ridgewood, NJ, USA. [Sampayo-Cordero M, Malfettone A] Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain. Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Ridgewood, NJ, USA. [Cortés J] International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Quironsalud Group, 08022 Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain. Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Ridgewood, NJ, USA. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid34868353
dc.identifier.wos000723874100002
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record