Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorSong, Yang
dc.contributor.authorLi, Jing
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yaolong
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Ruixia
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yuan
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Coello, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-29T07:27:12Z
dc.date.available2022-06-29T07:27:12Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-23
dc.identifier.citationSong Y, Li J, Chen Y, Guo R, Alonso-Coello P, Zhang Y. The development of clinical guidelines in China: insights from a national survey. Heal Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 23;19:151.
dc.identifier.issn1478-4505
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/7758
dc.descriptionChina; Practice guideline; Surveys and questionnaires
dc.description.abstractBackground Previous research suggests that the quality of clinical guidelines (CGs) in China is suboptimal. However, little is known about the methodology that CGs follow. We conducted a national survey of methods used by Chinese CG developers for CG development, adaptation, and updating. Methods We used a previously piloted questionnaire based on methodologies of CG development, adaptation, and updating, which was distributed during September–November 2020 to 114 organizations identified from published Chinese CGs (searched 2017–2020), recommended by Chinese CG developers, and recommended by clinical discipline experts. Results We collected 48 completed questionnaires (42.1% response). Most organizations developed CGs based on scientific evidence (89.6%), existing CGs (75%), or expert experience and opinion (64.6%). Only a few organizations had a specific CG development division (6.3%), a CG monitoring plan (on clinicians 33.3%; on patients 18.8%), funding (33.3%), or a conflict-of-interest (COI) management policy (23.4%). Thirty (62.5%) organizations reported using a CG development methodology handbook, from international organizations (14/30, 46.7%), methodology or evaluation resources (3/30, 10.0%), expert experience and opinion (3/30, 10.0%), or in-house handbooks (3/30, 10.0%). One organization followed a published adaptation methodology. Thirty-eight organizations (88.4%) reported de novo CG development: 21 (55.3%) formed a CG working group, and 29 (76.3%) evaluated the quality of evidence (21 [72.4%] using a methodological tool). Nineteen organizations (52.8%) reported CG adaptation: three (31.6%) had an adaptation working group, and 12 (63.2%) evaluated the quality of source CGs (2 (16.7%) using the AGREE II instrument). Thirty-three organizations (68.8%) updated their CGs, seven (17.5%) using a formal updating process. Conclusions Our study describes how CGs are developed in a middle-income country like China. To ensure better healthcare, there is still an important need for improvement in the development, adaptation, and updating of CG in China.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMC
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHealth Research Policy and Systems;19
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectEnquestes
dc.subjectAssistència sanitària - Utilització
dc.subjectMedicina clínica
dc.subject.meshEvidence-Based Medicine
dc.subject.meshSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject.meshDelivery of Health Care
dc.titleThe development of clinical guidelines in China: insights from a national survey
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12961-021-00799-7
dc.subject.decsmedicina basada en datos científicos
dc.subject.decsencuestas y cuestionarios
dc.subject.decsprestación sanitaria
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00799-7
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Song Y] Department of Gynaecology, First Afliated Hospital of Zhengzhou Uni versity, Zhengzhou, China. Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre – Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain. [Li J] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. [Chen Y] Evidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China. WHO Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, China. [Guo R] Department of Gynaecology, First Afliated Hospital of Zhengzhou Uni versity, Zhengzhou, China. [Alonso-Coello P] Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre – Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBER ESP), Madrid, Spain. [Zhang Y] Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
dc.identifier.pmid34949195
dc.identifier.wos000733737800002
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record