Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorRotstein, Dalia
dc.contributor.authorSolomon, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.authorSormani, Maria Pia
dc.contributor.authorMontalban, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorYe, Xiang Y.
dc.contributor.authorDababneh, Dina
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-18T13:18:58Z
dc.date.available2022-11-18T13:18:58Z
dc.date.issued2022-11
dc.identifier.citationRotstein D, Solomon JM, Sormani MP, Montalban X, Ye XY, Dababneh D, et al. Association of NEDA-4 With No Long-term Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis and Comparison With NEDA-3: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2022 Nov;9(6):e200032.
dc.identifier.issn2332-7812
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/8502
dc.descriptionMultiple sclerosis; Disability; NEDA-4
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives No evidence of disease activity (NEDA)-4 has been suggested as a treatment target for disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, the ability of NEDA-4 to discriminate long-term outcomes in MS and how its performance compares with NEDA-3 remain uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate (1) the association between NEDA-4 and no long-term disability progression in MS and (2) the comparative performance of NEDA-3 and NEDA-4 in predicting no long-term disability progression. Methods English-language abstracts and manuscripts were systematically searched in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane databases from January 2006 to November 2021 and reviewed independently by 2 investigators. We selected studies that assessed NEDA-4 at 1 or 2 years after DMT start and had at least 4 years of follow-up for determination of no confirmed disability progression. We conducted a meta-analysis using random-effects model to determine the pooled odds ratio (OR) for no disability progression with NEDA-4 vs EDA-4. For the comparative analysis, we selected studies that evaluated both NEDA-3 and NEDA-4 with at least 4 years of follow-up and examined the difference in the association of NEDA-3 and NEDA-4 with no disability progression. Results Five studies of 1,000 patients (3 interferon beta and 2 fingolimod) met inclusion criteria for both objectives. The median duration of follow-up was 6 years (interquartile range: 4–6 years). The prevalence of NEDA-4 ranged from 4.2% to 13.9% on interferon beta therapy and 24.9% to 25.1% on fingolimod therapy. The pooled OR for no long-term confirmed disability progression with NEDA-4 vs EDA-4 was 2.14 (95% confidence interval: 1.36–3.37; I2 = 0). We did not observe any significant difference between NEDA-4 and NEDA-3 in the comparative analyses. Discussion In patients with RRMS, NEDA-4 at 1–2 years was associated with 2 times higher odds of no long-term disability progression, at 6 years compared with EDA-4, but offered no advantage over NEDA-3.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Health
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNeurology, Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation;9(6)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectEsclerosi múltiple - Tractament
dc.subjectEsclerosi múltiple - Prognosi
dc.subject.meshMultiple Sclerosis
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshDisease Progression
dc.titleAssociation of NEDA-4 With No Long-term Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis and Comparison With NEDA-3: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1212/NXI.0000000000200032
dc.subject.decsesclerosis múltiple
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsprogresión de la enfermedad
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200032
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Rotstein D] Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. [Solomon JM] Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. [Sormani MP] Department of Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, University of Genova, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy. [Montalban X] Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d’Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. [Ye XY] Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada. [Dababneh D] Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Neurology, New York City; New York Presbyterian Hospital (NYP), New York City
dc.identifier.pmid36224046
dc.identifier.wos000874687300005
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record