Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorTewari, Krishnansu S.
dc.contributor.authorSill, Michael W.
dc.contributor.authorBirrer, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorPenson, Richard
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Helen
dc.contributor.authorMoore, David H.
dc.contributor.authorOaknin Benzaquen, Ana Mazaltob
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-04T06:31:32Z
dc.date.available2023-04-04T06:31:32Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.identifier.citationTewari KS, Sill MW, Birrer MJ, Penson RT, Huang H, Moore DH, et al. Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study. Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Apr;171:141–50.
dc.identifier.issn0090-8258
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/9290
dc.descriptionCervical cancer; Platinum; Topotecan
dc.description.abstractObjective To determine whether a non‑platinum chemotherapy doublet improves overall survival (OS) among patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical carcinoma. Methods Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 240 is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, clinical trial that studied the efficacy of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 plus topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 days 1–3 (n = 223) vs cisplatin 50 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 135 or 175 mg/m2 (n = 229), in 452 patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. Each chemotherapy doublet was also studied with and without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg). Cycles were repeated every 21 days until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or complete response. The primary endpoints were OS and the frequency and severity of adverse effects. We report the final analysis of OS. Results At the protocol-specified final analysis, median OS was 16.3 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) and 13.8 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone) (HR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91–1.38; p = 0.28). Median OS for cisplatin-paclitaxel and topotecan-paclitaxel was 15 vs 12 months, respectively (HR 1.10; 95% CI,0.82–1.48; p = 0.52), and for cisplatin-paclitaxel-bevacizumab and topotecan-paclitaxel-bevacizumab was 17.5 vs 16.2 months, respectively (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 0.86–1.56; p = 0.34). Among the 75% of patients in the study population previously exposed to platinum, median OS was 14.6 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) vs 12.9 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone), respectively (HR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86–1.38;p = 0.48). Post-progression survival was 7.9 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) vs 8.1 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone) (HR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.75–1.19). Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was similar between chemotherapy backbones. Conclusions Topotecan plus paclitaxel does not confer a survival benefit to women with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer, even among platinum-exposed patients. Topotecan-paclitaxel should not be routinely recommended in this population.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGynecologic Oncology;171
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectColl uterí - Càncer - Tractament
dc.subjectMedicaments antineoplàstics - Ús terapèutic
dc.subjectAnàlisi de supervivència (Biometria)
dc.subject.meshUterine Cervical Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subject.meshSurvival Analysis
dc.titleFinal survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer: An NRG oncology randomized study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.010
dc.subject.decsneoplasias del cuello uterino
dc.subject.decsprotocolos de quimioterapia antineoplásica combinada
dc.subject.decsanálisis de supervivencia
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.010
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Tewari KS] University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA. [Sill MW, Huang H] Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY, USA. [Birrer MJ] University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. [Penson RT] Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. [Moore DH] Franciscan S. Francis Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA. [Oaknin A] Gynaecologic Cancer Programme, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid36898292
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record