Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorConsorci Sanitari de Terrassa
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Manau, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorMendoza, Manel
dc.contributor.authorBonacina, Erika
dc.contributor.authorMartin-Alonso, Raquel
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Lourdes
dc.contributor.authorPalacios, Ana
dc.contributor.authorGARCIA, ESPERANZA
dc.contributor.authorVives, Angels
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-17T12:28:51Z
dc.date.available2023-05-17T12:28:51Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-11
dc.identifier.citationGarcia-Manau P, Mendoza M, Bonacina E, Martin-Alonso R, Martin L, Palacios A, et al. The Fetal Growth Restriction at Term Managed by Angiogenic Factors Versus Feto-Maternal Doppler (GRAFD) Trial to Avoid Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: Protocol for a Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Oct 11;11(10):e37452.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/9552
dc.descriptionAngiogenic factors; Fetal growth restriction; Small for gestational age
dc.description.abstractBackground: Fetal smallness affects 10% of pregnancies. Small fetuses are at a higher risk of adverse outcomes. Their management using estimated fetal weight and feto-maternal Doppler has a high sensitivity for adverse outcomes; however, more than 60% of fetuses are electively delivered at 37 to 38 weeks. On the other hand, classification using angiogenic factors seems to have a lower false-positive rate. Here, we present a protocol for the Fetal Growth Restriction at Term Managed by Angiogenic Factors Versus Feto-Maternal Doppler (GRAFD) trial, which compares the use of angiogenic factors and Doppler to manage small fetuses at term. Objective: The primary objective is to demonstrate that classification based on angiogenic factors is not inferior to estimated fetal weight and Doppler at detecting fetuses at risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted in 20 hospitals across Spain. A total of 1030 singleton pregnancies with an estimated fetal weight ≤10th percentile at 36+0 to 37+6 weeks+days will be recruited and randomly allocated to either the control or the intervention group. In the control group, standard Doppler-based management will be used. In the intervention group, cases with a soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase to placental growth factor ratio ≥38 will be classified as having fetal growth restriction; otherwise, they will be classified as being small for gestational age. In both arms, the fetal growth restriction group will be delivered at ≥37 weeks and the small for gestational age group at ≥40 weeks. We will assess differences between the groups by calculating the relative risk, the absolute difference between incidences, and their 95% CIs. Results: Recruitment for this study started on September 28, 2020. The study results are expected to be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at international conferences in early 2023. Conclusions: The angiogenic factor-based protocol may reduce the number of pregnancies classified as having fetal growth restriction without worsening perinatal outcomes. Moreover, reducing the number of unnecessary labor inductions would reduce costs and the risks derived from possible iatrogenic complications. Additionally, fewer inductions would lower the rate of early-term neonates, thus improving neonatal outcomes and potentially reducing long-term infant morbidities.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJMIR Publications
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJMIR Research Protocols;11(10)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectFetus - Creixement
dc.subjectFactors de creixement
dc.subjectEcografia Doppler
dc.subject.meshPlacenta Growth Factor
dc.subject.meshFetal Growth Retardation
dc.subject.meshUltrasonography, Doppler
dc.titleThe Fetal Growth Restriction at Term Managed by Angiogenic Factors Versus Feto-Maternal Doppler (GRAFD) Trial to Avoid Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: Protocol for a Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/37452
dc.subject.decsfactor de crecimiento placentario
dc.subject.decsretraso del crecimiento fetal
dc.subject.decsecografía Doppler
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.2196/37452
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.event.productorBiblioteca
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Garcia-Manau P, Mendoza M, Bonacina E] Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Martin-Alonso R] Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Madrid, Spain. School of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain. [Martin L] Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain. [Palacios A] Department of Obstetrics, Alicante University General Hospital, Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain. Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research, Alicante, Spain. [Garcia E, Vives A] Unitat de Medicina Materno-Fetal, Servei d’Obstetrícia, Hospital de Terrassa, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain. Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid36222789
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record