Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorDurães Campos, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Catarina
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Ana Rita
dc.contributor.authorBasílio, Carla
dc.contributor.authorNeves, Aida
dc.contributor.authorTorrella Llauger, Pau
dc.contributor.authorRiera del Brio, Jordi
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-20T07:31:36Z
dc.date.available2024-08-20T07:31:36Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-11
dc.identifier.citationDurães-Campos I, Costa C, Ferreira AR, Basílio C, Torrella P, Neves A, et al. ECMO for drug-refractory electrical storm without a reversible trigger: a retrospective multicentric observational study. ESC Hear Fail. 2024 Apr;11(4):2129–37.
dc.identifier.issn2055-5822
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/11841
dc.descriptionCatheter ablation; Electrical storm; Heart transplantation
dc.description.abstractAims Drug-refractory electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening medical emergency. We describe the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in drug-refractory ES without a reversible trigger, for which specific guideline recommendations are still lacking. Methods and results Retrospective observational study in four Iberian centres on the indications, treatment, complications, and outcome of drug-refractory ES not associated with acute coronary syndromes, decompensated heart failure, drug toxicity, electrolyte disturbances, endocrine emergencies, concomitant acute illness with fever, or poor compliance with anti-arrhythmic drugs, requiring VA-ECMO for circulatory support. Thirty-four (6%) out of 552 patients with VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock were included [71% men; 57 (44–62) years], 65% underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation before VA-ECMO implantation, and 26% during cannulation. Left ventricular unloading during VA-ECMO was used in 8 (24%) patients: 3 (9%) with intraaortic balloon pump, 3 (9%) with LV vent, and 2 (6%) with Impella. Thirty (88%) had structural heart disease and 8 (24%) had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. The drug-refractory ES was mostly due to monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) (59%), isolated monomorphic VT (26%), polymorphic VT (9%), or VF (6%). Thirty-one (91%) required deep sedation, 44% overdrive pacing, 36% catheter ablation, and 26% acute autonomic modulation. The main complications were nosocomial infection (47%), bleeding (24%), and limb ischaemia (21%). Eighteen (53%) were weaned from VA-ECMO, and 29% had heart transplantation. Twenty-seven (79%) survived to hospital discharge (48 (33–82) days). Non-survivors were older [62 (58–67) vs. 54 (43–58); P < 0.01] and had a higher first rhythm disorder-to-ECMO interval [0 (0–2) vs. 2 (1-11) days; P = 0.02]. Seven (20%) had rehospitalization during follow-up [29 (12–48) months], with ES recurrence in 6%. Conclusions VA-ECMO bridged drug-refractory ES without a reversible trigger with a high success rate. This required prolonged hospital stays and coordination between the ECMO centre, the electrophysiology laboratory, and the heart transplant programme.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley Open Access
dc.relation.ispartofseriesESC Heart Failure;11(4)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectAvaluació de resultats (Assistència sanitària)
dc.subjectFibril·lació ventricular - Tractament
dc.subjectAntiarítmics cardíacs - Ús terapèutic
dc.subjectSang - Circulació artificial
dc.subject.meshTachycardia, Ventricular
dc.subject.mesh/therapy
dc.subject.meshAnti-Arrhythmia Agents
dc.subject.meshExtracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.titleECMO for drug-refractory electrical storm without a reversible trigger: a retrospective multicentric observational study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ehf2.14756
dc.subject.decstaquicardia ventricular
dc.subject.decs/terapia
dc.subject.decsantiarrítmicos
dc.subject.decsoxigenación por membrana extracorpórea
dc.subject.decsresultado del tratamiento
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14756
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Durães-Campos I, Ferreira AR, Basílio C, Neves A] Department of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal. [Costa C] Department of Cardiology, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal. [Torrella P, Riera J] Servei de Medicina Intensiva, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid38605602
dc.identifier.wos001200747600001
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record