Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorQuint, Jennifer K.
dc.contributor.authorMontonen, Jukka
dc.contributor.authorEsposito, Daina B.
dc.contributor.authorHe, Xintong
dc.contributor.authorKoerner, Leslie
dc.contributor.authorWallace, Laura
dc.contributor.authorMiravitlles Fernández, Marc
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T07:40:53Z
dc.date.available2022-03-10T07:40:53Z
dc.date.issued2021-05
dc.identifier.citationQuint JK, Montonen J, Esposito DB, He X, Koerner L, Wallace L, et al. Effectiveness and Safety of COPD Maintenance Therapy with Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus LABA/ICS in a US Claims Database. Adv Ther. 2021 May;38:2249–2270.
dc.identifier.issn1865-8652
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/7133
dc.descriptionChronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Corticosteroids; Olodaterol
dc.description.abstractIntroduction In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) combination therapy significantly improves lung function versus LABA/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). To investigate whether LAMA/LABA could provide better clinical outcomes than LABA/ICS, this non-interventional database study assessed the risk of COPD exacerbations, pneumonia, and escalation to triple therapy in patients with COPD initiating maintenance therapy with tiotropium/olodaterol versus any LABA/ICS combination. Methods Administrative healthcare claims and laboratory results data from the US HealthCore Integrated Research DatabaseSM were evaluated for patients with COPD initiating tiotropium/olodaterol versus LABA/ICS treatment (January 2013–March 2019). Patients were aged at least 40 years with a diagnosis of COPD (but not asthma) at cohort entry. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used (as-treated analysis) to assess risk of COPD exacerbation, community-acquired pneumonia, and escalation to triple therapy, both individually and as a combined risk of any one of these events. Potential imbalance of confounding factors between cohorts was handled using fine stratification, reweighting, and trimming by exposure propensity score (high-dimensional); subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of blood eosinophil levels and exacerbation history. Results The total population consisted of 61,985 patients (tiotropium/olodaterol n = 2684; LABA/ICS n = 59,301); after reweighting, the total was 42,953 patients (tiotropium/olodaterol n = 2600; LABA/ICS n = 40,353; mean age 65 years; female 54.5%). Patients treated with tiotropium/olodaterol versus LABA/ICS experienced a reduction in the risk of COPD exacerbations (adjusted hazard ratio 0.76 [95% confidence interval 0.68, 0.85]), pneumonia (0.74 [0.57, 0.97]), escalation to triple therapy (0.22 [0.19, 0.26]), and any one of these events (0.45 [0.41, 0.49]); the combined risk was similar irrespective of baseline eosinophils and exacerbation history. Conclusions In patients with COPD, tiotropium/olodaterol was associated with a lower risk of COPD exacerbations, pneumonia, and escalation to triple therapy versus LABA/ICS, both individually and in combination; the combined risk was reduced irrespective of baseline eosinophils or exacerbation history.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAdvances in Therapy;38
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectPulmons - Malalties obstructives - Tractament
dc.subjectAvaluació de resultats (Assistència sanitària)
dc.subjectFarmacologia respiratòria
dc.subject.meshPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
dc.subject.mesh/drug therapy
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.subject.meshTiotropium Bromide
dc.titleEffectiveness and Safety of COPD Maintenance Therapy with Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus LABA/ICS in a US Claims Database
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12325-021-01646-5
dc.subject.decsenfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica
dc.subject.decs/farmacoterapia
dc.subject.decsresultado del tratamiento
dc.subject.decsbromuro de tiotropio
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01646-5
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Quint JK] National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. [Montonen J, Wallace L] Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany. [Esposito DB, He X, Koerner L] Department of Safety and Epidemiology, HealthCore, Inc, Watertown, MA, USA. [Miravitlles M] Servei de Pneumologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain
dc.identifier.pmid33721209
dc.identifier.wos000629189600001
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record