dc.contributor | Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus |
dc.contributor.author | Quint, Jennifer K. |
dc.contributor.author | Montonen, Jukka |
dc.contributor.author | Esposito, Daina B. |
dc.contributor.author | He, Xintong |
dc.contributor.author | Koerner, Leslie |
dc.contributor.author | Wallace, Laura |
dc.contributor.author | Miravitlles Fernández, Marc |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-10T07:40:53Z |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-10T07:40:53Z |
dc.date.issued | 2021-05 |
dc.identifier.citation | Quint JK, Montonen J, Esposito DB, He X, Koerner L, Wallace L, et al. Effectiveness and Safety of COPD Maintenance Therapy with Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus LABA/ICS in a US Claims Database. Adv Ther. 2021 May;38:2249–2270. |
dc.identifier.issn | 1865-8652 |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11351/7133 |
dc.description | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Corticosteroids; Olodaterol |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction
In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) combination therapy significantly improves lung function versus LABA/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). To investigate whether LAMA/LABA could provide better clinical outcomes than LABA/ICS, this non-interventional database study assessed the risk of COPD exacerbations, pneumonia, and escalation to triple therapy in patients with COPD initiating maintenance therapy with tiotropium/olodaterol versus any LABA/ICS combination.
Methods
Administrative healthcare claims and laboratory results data from the US HealthCore Integrated Research DatabaseSM were evaluated for patients with COPD initiating tiotropium/olodaterol versus LABA/ICS treatment (January 2013–March 2019). Patients were aged at least 40 years with a diagnosis of COPD (but not asthma) at cohort entry. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used (as-treated analysis) to assess risk of COPD exacerbation, community-acquired pneumonia, and escalation to triple therapy, both individually and as a combined risk of any one of these events. Potential imbalance of confounding factors between cohorts was handled using fine stratification, reweighting, and trimming by exposure propensity score (high-dimensional); subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of blood eosinophil levels and exacerbation history.
Results
The total population consisted of 61,985 patients (tiotropium/olodaterol n = 2684; LABA/ICS n = 59,301); after reweighting, the total was 42,953 patients (tiotropium/olodaterol n = 2600; LABA/ICS n = 40,353; mean age 65 years; female 54.5%). Patients treated with tiotropium/olodaterol versus LABA/ICS experienced a reduction in the risk of COPD exacerbations (adjusted hazard ratio 0.76 [95% confidence interval 0.68, 0.85]), pneumonia (0.74 [0.57, 0.97]), escalation to triple therapy (0.22 [0.19, 0.26]), and any one of these events (0.45 [0.41, 0.49]); the combined risk was similar irrespective of baseline eosinophils and exacerbation history.
Conclusions
In patients with COPD, tiotropium/olodaterol was associated with a lower risk of COPD exacerbations, pneumonia, and escalation to triple therapy versus LABA/ICS, both individually and in combination; the combined risk was reduced irrespective of baseline eosinophils or exacerbation history. |
dc.language.iso | eng |
dc.publisher | Springer |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Advances in Therapy;38 |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
dc.source | Scientia |
dc.subject | Pulmons - Malalties obstructives - Tractament |
dc.subject | Avaluació de resultats (Assistència sanitària) |
dc.subject | Farmacologia respiratòria |
dc.subject.mesh | Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |
dc.subject.mesh | /drug therapy |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome |
dc.subject.mesh | Tiotropium Bromide |
dc.title | Effectiveness and Safety of COPD Maintenance Therapy with Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus LABA/ICS in a US Claims Database |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s12325-021-01646-5 |
dc.subject.decs | enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica |
dc.subject.decs | /farmacoterapia |
dc.subject.decs | resultado del tratamiento |
dc.subject.decs | bromuro de tiotropio |
dc.relation.publishversion | https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01646-5 |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.audience | Professionals |
dc.contributor.organismes | Institut Català de la Salut |
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation | [Quint JK] National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. [Montonen J, Wallace L] Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany. [Esposito DB, He X, Koerner L] Department of Safety and Epidemiology, HealthCore, Inc, Watertown, MA, USA. [Miravitlles M] Servei de Pneumologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain |
dc.identifier.pmid | 33721209 |
dc.identifier.wos | 000629189600001 |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |