Show simple item record

 
dc.contributorVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
dc.contributor.authorLipton, Richard B
dc.contributor.authorPozo Rosich, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorBlumenfeld, Andrew M
dc.contributor.authorLi, Ye
dc.contributor.authorSevert, Lawrence
dc.contributor.authorStokes, Jonathan
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-25T07:54:58Z
dc.date.available2023-04-25T07:54:58Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-21
dc.identifier.citationLipton RB, Pozo-Rosich P, Blumenfeld A, Li Y, Severt L, Stokes JT, et al. Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial. Neurology. 2023 Feb 21;100(8):e764–77.
dc.identifier.issn1526-632X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11351/9412
dc.descriptionAtogepant; Preventive treatment; Migraine
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives The oral calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist atogepant is indicated for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine. We evaluated changes in patient-reported outcomes with atogepant in adults with migraine. Methods In this phase 3, 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial (ADVANCE), adults with 4–14 migraine days per month received atogepant (10, 30, or 60 mg) once daily or placebo. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version 2.1 Role Function–Restrictive (RFR) domain at week 12 and mean monthly Activity Impairment in Migraine–Diary (AIM-D) Performance of Daily Activities (PDA) and Physical Impairment (PI) domains across the 12-week treatment period. Exploratory endpoints included change in MSQ Role Function–Preventive (RFP) and Emotional Function (EF) domains; AIM-D total scores; and change in Headache Impact Test (HIT)–6 scores. Results Of 910 participants randomized, 873 comprised the modified intent-to-treat population (atogepant: 10 mg [n = 214]; 30 mg [n = 223]; and 60 mg [n = 222]; placebo [n = 214]). All atogepant groups demonstrated significantly greater improvements vs placebo in MSQ RFR that exceeded minimum clinically meaningful between-group difference (3.2 points) at week 12 (least-square mean difference [LSMD] vs placebo: 10 mg [9.9]; 30 mg [10.1]; 60 mg [10.8]; all p < 0.0001). LSMDs in monthly AIM-D PDA and PI scores across the 12-week treatment period improved significantly for the atogepant 30 (PDA: −2.54; p = 0.0003; PI: −1.99; and p = 0.0011) and 60 mg groups (PDA: −3.32; p < 0.0001; PI: −2.46; p < 0.0001), but not for the 10 mg group (PDA: −1.19; p = 0.086; PI: −1.08; p = 0.074). In exploratory analyses, atogepant 30 and 60 mg were associated with nominal improvements in MSQ RFP and EF domains, other AIM-D outcomes, and HIT-6 scores at the earliest time point (week 4) and throughout the 12-week treatment period. Results varied for atogepant 10 mg. Discussion Atogepant 30 and 60 mg produced significant improvements in key patient-reported outcomes including MSQ-RFR scores and both AIM-D domains. Nominal improvements also occurred for other MSQ domains and HIT-6, reinforcing the beneficial effects of atogepant as a new treatment for migraine prevention.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Health
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNeurology;100(8)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScientia
dc.subjectMigranya - Prevenció
dc.subjectPacients - Satisfacció
dc.subjectAvaluació de resultats (Assistència sanitària)
dc.subject.meshMigraine Disorders
dc.subject.mesh/prevention & control
dc.subject.meshPatient Reported Outcome Measures
dc.subject.meshDouble-Blind Method
dc.titleEffect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1212/WNL.0000000000201568
dc.subject.decstrastornos migrañosos
dc.subject.decs/prevención & control
dc.subject.decsmedidas de resultados percibidos por los pacientes
dc.subject.decsmétodo doble ciego
dc.relation.publishversionhttps://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201568
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.audienceProfessionals
dc.contributor.organismesInstitut Català de la Salut
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Lipton RB] Albert Einstein College of Medicine and the Montefiore Headache Center, Bronx, NY. [Pozo-Rosich P] Unitat de Cefalea, Servei de Neurologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Grup de Recerca de Cefalea i Dolor Neurològic, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. [Blumenfeld AM] Headache Center of Southern California, Carlsbad, CA. [Li Y, Severt L, Stokes JT] AbbVie, Madison, NJ, USA
dc.identifier.pmid36396451
dc.identifier.wos000943191900011
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record