dc.contributor | Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus |
dc.contributor.author | Lipton, Richard B |
dc.contributor.author | Pozo Rosich, Patricia |
dc.contributor.author | Blumenfeld, Andrew M |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Ye |
dc.contributor.author | Severt, Lawrence |
dc.contributor.author | Stokes, Jonathan |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-25T07:54:58Z |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-25T07:54:58Z |
dc.date.issued | 2023-02-21 |
dc.identifier.citation | Lipton RB, Pozo-Rosich P, Blumenfeld A, Li Y, Severt L, Stokes JT, et al. Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial. Neurology. 2023 Feb 21;100(8):e764–77. |
dc.identifier.issn | 1526-632X |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11351/9412 |
dc.description | Atogepant; Preventive treatment; Migraine |
dc.description.abstract | Background and Objectives The oral calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist atogepant is indicated for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine. We evaluated changes in patient-reported outcomes with atogepant in adults with migraine. Methods In this phase 3, 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial (ADVANCE), adults with 4–14 migraine days per month received atogepant (10, 30, or 60 mg) once daily or placebo. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version 2.1 Role Function–Restrictive (RFR) domain at week 12 and mean monthly Activity Impairment in Migraine–Diary (AIM-D) Performance of Daily Activities (PDA) and Physical Impairment (PI) domains across the 12-week treatment period. Exploratory endpoints included change in MSQ Role Function–Preventive (RFP) and Emotional Function (EF) domains; AIM-D total scores; and change in Headache Impact Test (HIT)–6 scores. Results Of 910 participants randomized, 873 comprised the modified intent-to-treat population (atogepant: 10 mg [n = 214]; 30 mg [n = 223]; and 60 mg [n = 222]; placebo [n = 214]). All atogepant groups demonstrated significantly greater improvements vs placebo in MSQ RFR that exceeded minimum clinically meaningful between-group difference (3.2 points) at week 12 (least-square mean difference [LSMD] vs placebo: 10 mg [9.9]; 30 mg [10.1]; 60 mg [10.8]; all p < 0.0001). LSMDs in monthly AIM-D PDA and PI scores across the 12-week treatment period improved significantly for the atogepant 30 (PDA: −2.54; p = 0.0003; PI: −1.99; and p = 0.0011) and 60 mg groups (PDA: −3.32; p < 0.0001; PI: −2.46; p < 0.0001), but not for the 10 mg group (PDA: −1.19; p = 0.086; PI: −1.08; p = 0.074). In exploratory analyses, atogepant 30 and 60 mg were associated with nominal improvements in MSQ RFP and EF domains, other AIM-D outcomes, and HIT-6 scores at the earliest time point (week 4) and throughout the 12-week treatment period. Results varied for atogepant 10 mg. Discussion Atogepant 30 and 60 mg produced significant improvements in key patient-reported outcomes including MSQ-RFR scores and both AIM-D domains. Nominal improvements also occurred for other MSQ domains and HIT-6, reinforcing the beneficial effects of atogepant as a new treatment for migraine prevention. |
dc.language.iso | eng |
dc.publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Neurology;100(8) |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.source | Scientia |
dc.subject | Migranya - Prevenció |
dc.subject | Pacients - Satisfacció |
dc.subject | Avaluació de resultats (Assistència sanitària) |
dc.subject.mesh | Migraine Disorders |
dc.subject.mesh | /prevention & control |
dc.subject.mesh | Patient Reported Outcome Measures |
dc.subject.mesh | Double-Blind Method |
dc.title | Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201568 |
dc.subject.decs | trastornos migrañosos |
dc.subject.decs | /prevención & control |
dc.subject.decs | medidas de resultados percibidos por los pacientes |
dc.subject.decs | método doble ciego |
dc.relation.publishversion | https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201568 |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.audience | Professionals |
dc.contributor.organismes | Institut Català de la Salut |
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation | [Lipton RB] Albert Einstein College of Medicine and the Montefiore Headache Center, Bronx, NY. [Pozo-Rosich P] Unitat de Cefalea, Servei de Neurologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Grup de Recerca de Cefalea i Dolor Neurològic, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. [Blumenfeld AM] Headache Center of Southern California, Carlsbad, CA. [Li Y, Severt L, Stokes JT] AbbVie, Madison, NJ, USA |
dc.identifier.pmid | 36396451 |
dc.identifier.wos | 000943191900011 |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |